Limits...
Return to work of workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Lammerts L, Vermeulen SJ, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen W, Anema JR - BMC Public Health (2014)

Bottom Line: If the participatory supportive return to work program proves to be cost-effective, the social security system, the sick-listed worker and society as a whole will benefit.A cost-effective return to work program will lead to a reduction of costs related to sickness absence.For the sick-listed worker a cost-effective program results in earlier sustainable return to work, which can be associated with both social and health benefits.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO + Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, P,O, Box 7057, Amsterdam 1007 MB, The Netherlands. h.anema@vumc.nl.

ABSTRACT

Background: Workers without a permanent employment contract represent a vulnerable group within the working population. Mental disorders are a major cause of sickness absence within this group. Common mental disorders are stress-related, depressive and anxiety disorders. To date, little attention has been paid to effective return to work interventions for this type of sick-listed workers. Therefore, a participatory supportive return to work program has been developed. It combines elements of a participatory return to work program, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job.The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program compared to care as usual.

Methods/design: The cost-effectiveness of the participatory supportive return to work program will be examined in a randomised controlled trial with a follow-up of twelve months.The program strongly involves the sick-listed worker in the identification of obstacles for return to work and possible solutions, resulting in a consensus based action plan. This plan will be used as a starting point for the search of suitable competitive employment with support of a rehabilitation agency. During this process the insurance physician of the sick-listed worker contacts other caregivers to promote integrated care.Workers eligible to participate in this study have no permanent employment contract, have applied for a sickness benefit at the Dutch Social Security Agency and are sick-listed between two and fourteen weeks due to mental health problems.The primary outcome measure is the duration until first sustainable return to work in a competitive job. Outcomes are measured at baseline and after three, six, nine and twelve months.

Discussion: If the participatory supportive return to work program proves to be cost-effective, the social security system, the sick-listed worker and society as a whole will benefit. A cost-effective return to work program will lead to a reduction of costs related to sickness absence. For the sick-listed worker a cost-effective program results in earlier sustainable return to work, which can be associated with both social and health benefits.

Trial registration: The trial registration number and date is NTR3563, August 7, 2012.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Design of the randomised controlled trial.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4061521&req=5

Figure 1: Design of the randomised controlled trial.

Mentions: In Figure 1 the consecutive steps in the study design are summarized.


Return to work of workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Lammerts L, Vermeulen SJ, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen W, Anema JR - BMC Public Health (2014)

Design of the randomised controlled trial.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4061521&req=5

Figure 1: Design of the randomised controlled trial.
Mentions: In Figure 1 the consecutive steps in the study design are summarized.

Bottom Line: If the participatory supportive return to work program proves to be cost-effective, the social security system, the sick-listed worker and society as a whole will benefit.A cost-effective return to work program will lead to a reduction of costs related to sickness absence.For the sick-listed worker a cost-effective program results in earlier sustainable return to work, which can be associated with both social and health benefits.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO + Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, P,O, Box 7057, Amsterdam 1007 MB, The Netherlands. h.anema@vumc.nl.

ABSTRACT

Background: Workers without a permanent employment contract represent a vulnerable group within the working population. Mental disorders are a major cause of sickness absence within this group. Common mental disorders are stress-related, depressive and anxiety disorders. To date, little attention has been paid to effective return to work interventions for this type of sick-listed workers. Therefore, a participatory supportive return to work program has been developed. It combines elements of a participatory return to work program, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job.The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program compared to care as usual.

Methods/design: The cost-effectiveness of the participatory supportive return to work program will be examined in a randomised controlled trial with a follow-up of twelve months.The program strongly involves the sick-listed worker in the identification of obstacles for return to work and possible solutions, resulting in a consensus based action plan. This plan will be used as a starting point for the search of suitable competitive employment with support of a rehabilitation agency. During this process the insurance physician of the sick-listed worker contacts other caregivers to promote integrated care.Workers eligible to participate in this study have no permanent employment contract, have applied for a sickness benefit at the Dutch Social Security Agency and are sick-listed between two and fourteen weeks due to mental health problems.The primary outcome measure is the duration until first sustainable return to work in a competitive job. Outcomes are measured at baseline and after three, six, nine and twelve months.

Discussion: If the participatory supportive return to work program proves to be cost-effective, the social security system, the sick-listed worker and society as a whole will benefit. A cost-effective return to work program will lead to a reduction of costs related to sickness absence. For the sick-listed worker a cost-effective program results in earlier sustainable return to work, which can be associated with both social and health benefits.

Trial registration: The trial registration number and date is NTR3563, August 7, 2012.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus