Limits...
Correction: A Bioartificial Renal Tubule Device Embedding Human Renal Stem/Progenitor Cells

View Article: PubMed Central

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

On-chip formation of a confluent monolayer of renal tubule cells.(A) Device fluidic characterization by diffusion test: a solution of rhodamine 6G was fed in the upper channel while distilled water was fed in the lower channel (interstitial). The increase in the fluorescence intensity with time at the outlet of the lower channel was correlated to the rhodamine diffusion into the channel. The superimposed line is the corresponding data in a standard cell culture insert using the same porous membrane. Inset: device and counter-current flow schematics. Scale bars  =  250 µm. (B) HK-2 cell proliferation described by MTS assay after 2 days of culture on the membranes functionalized with fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN) and Matrigel (M), compared to the untreated membranes (Untr.) and the positive controls of polystyrene dishes (PS). Results are expressed as (mean ± standard deviation) of three independent experiments. Bars show statistically significant differences (P<0.05). (inset) Optical micrographs of water droplets on membranes with or without FN, and corresponding WCA value. (C-F) Optimization of HK-2 cell growth in the device. A starting concentration of 5×105 cells mL-1 was insufficient for a successful colonization of the membrane by cells (C), while a concentration ≥ 1.5×106 cells mL-1 led to a confluent growth (D). Culturing cells for 4 days under a constant flux (1 µL min-1) of cell medium did not allow the formation of a continuous monolayer (E). Cell confluence was instead achieved by letting seeded cells in a static fluid environment for 24 h and culturing them over 4 days by changing the complete growth medium twice a day (F). Scale bars  =  100 µm. (G) Scheme of the resulting cell confluent monolayer on the membrane. Confluent living cells were stained with DAPI (blue) (H) and TRITC-phalloidin (red) (I). Scale bars  =  100 µm.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4048272&req=5

pone-0100141-g001: On-chip formation of a confluent monolayer of renal tubule cells.(A) Device fluidic characterization by diffusion test: a solution of rhodamine 6G was fed in the upper channel while distilled water was fed in the lower channel (interstitial). The increase in the fluorescence intensity with time at the outlet of the lower channel was correlated to the rhodamine diffusion into the channel. The superimposed line is the corresponding data in a standard cell culture insert using the same porous membrane. Inset: device and counter-current flow schematics. Scale bars  =  250 µm. (B) HK-2 cell proliferation described by MTS assay after 2 days of culture on the membranes functionalized with fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN) and Matrigel (M), compared to the untreated membranes (Untr.) and the positive controls of polystyrene dishes (PS). Results are expressed as (mean ± standard deviation) of three independent experiments. Bars show statistically significant differences (P<0.05). (inset) Optical micrographs of water droplets on membranes with or without FN, and corresponding WCA value. (C-F) Optimization of HK-2 cell growth in the device. A starting concentration of 5×105 cells mL-1 was insufficient for a successful colonization of the membrane by cells (C), while a concentration ≥ 1.5×106 cells mL-1 led to a confluent growth (D). Culturing cells for 4 days under a constant flux (1 µL min-1) of cell medium did not allow the formation of a continuous monolayer (E). Cell confluence was instead achieved by letting seeded cells in a static fluid environment for 24 h and culturing them over 4 days by changing the complete growth medium twice a day (F). Scale bars  =  100 µm. (G) Scheme of the resulting cell confluent monolayer on the membrane. Confluent living cells were stained with DAPI (blue) (H) and TRITC-phalloidin (red) (I). Scale bars  =  100 µm.

Mentions: The figure legends for Figure 2 and 5 are incorrect. There are incorrect values presented for the scale bars in the legends. Please see these figures and their corrected legends below.


Correction: A Bioartificial Renal Tubule Device Embedding Human Renal Stem/Progenitor Cells
On-chip formation of a confluent monolayer of renal tubule cells.(A) Device fluidic characterization by diffusion test: a solution of rhodamine 6G was fed in the upper channel while distilled water was fed in the lower channel (interstitial). The increase in the fluorescence intensity with time at the outlet of the lower channel was correlated to the rhodamine diffusion into the channel. The superimposed line is the corresponding data in a standard cell culture insert using the same porous membrane. Inset: device and counter-current flow schematics. Scale bars  =  250 µm. (B) HK-2 cell proliferation described by MTS assay after 2 days of culture on the membranes functionalized with fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN) and Matrigel (M), compared to the untreated membranes (Untr.) and the positive controls of polystyrene dishes (PS). Results are expressed as (mean ± standard deviation) of three independent experiments. Bars show statistically significant differences (P<0.05). (inset) Optical micrographs of water droplets on membranes with or without FN, and corresponding WCA value. (C-F) Optimization of HK-2 cell growth in the device. A starting concentration of 5×105 cells mL-1 was insufficient for a successful colonization of the membrane by cells (C), while a concentration ≥ 1.5×106 cells mL-1 led to a confluent growth (D). Culturing cells for 4 days under a constant flux (1 µL min-1) of cell medium did not allow the formation of a continuous monolayer (E). Cell confluence was instead achieved by letting seeded cells in a static fluid environment for 24 h and culturing them over 4 days by changing the complete growth medium twice a day (F). Scale bars  =  100 µm. (G) Scheme of the resulting cell confluent monolayer on the membrane. Confluent living cells were stained with DAPI (blue) (H) and TRITC-phalloidin (red) (I). Scale bars  =  100 µm.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4048272&req=5

pone-0100141-g001: On-chip formation of a confluent monolayer of renal tubule cells.(A) Device fluidic characterization by diffusion test: a solution of rhodamine 6G was fed in the upper channel while distilled water was fed in the lower channel (interstitial). The increase in the fluorescence intensity with time at the outlet of the lower channel was correlated to the rhodamine diffusion into the channel. The superimposed line is the corresponding data in a standard cell culture insert using the same porous membrane. Inset: device and counter-current flow schematics. Scale bars  =  250 µm. (B) HK-2 cell proliferation described by MTS assay after 2 days of culture on the membranes functionalized with fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN) and Matrigel (M), compared to the untreated membranes (Untr.) and the positive controls of polystyrene dishes (PS). Results are expressed as (mean ± standard deviation) of three independent experiments. Bars show statistically significant differences (P<0.05). (inset) Optical micrographs of water droplets on membranes with or without FN, and corresponding WCA value. (C-F) Optimization of HK-2 cell growth in the device. A starting concentration of 5×105 cells mL-1 was insufficient for a successful colonization of the membrane by cells (C), while a concentration ≥ 1.5×106 cells mL-1 led to a confluent growth (D). Culturing cells for 4 days under a constant flux (1 µL min-1) of cell medium did not allow the formation of a continuous monolayer (E). Cell confluence was instead achieved by letting seeded cells in a static fluid environment for 24 h and culturing them over 4 days by changing the complete growth medium twice a day (F). Scale bars  =  100 µm. (G) Scheme of the resulting cell confluent monolayer on the membrane. Confluent living cells were stained with DAPI (blue) (H) and TRITC-phalloidin (red) (I). Scale bars  =  100 µm.
Mentions: The figure legends for Figure 2 and 5 are incorrect. There are incorrect values presented for the scale bars in the legends. Please see these figures and their corrected legends below.

View Article: PubMed Central

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus