Limits...
Phase contrast MRI with flow compensation view sharing (FCVS)

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

Six healthy volunteers were recruited in the prospective study and were scanned by the standard FCFE PC-MRI sequence and FCVS sequence under free breathing... The peak velocity and total volumetric flow measurements of FCVS are compared with standard FCFE with same temporal resolution but double total acquisition time... An example of a healthy volunteer's peak velocity measurements with: 1) FCFE PC-MRI with 2 views-per-segment and 34 ms temporal resolution, 2) FCVS with 2 views-per-segment and 17 ms-temporal-resolution, and 3) FCFE PC-MRI with 1 view-per-segment with 17 ms-temporal-resolution are shown in Figure 2b... The 34 ms-temporal-resolution FCFE scan failed to capture the maximum peak velocity at around 90 ms into the cardiac cycle... The 17 ms FCVS scan provided similar peak velocity values as the 17 ms FCFE scan albeit at half of the total acquisition time... A Bland-Altman plot of total 24 volumetric flow values (left and right CCA in the six volunteers with 17 ms and 34 ms temporal resolutions) measured by FCVS and standard FCFE PC-MRI are shown in Figure 2c... The bias was 0.05 mL and the 95% confidence interval was [-0.25, 0.35] mL... The bias error in volumetric flow quantification was ≤1.3%... FCVS can accelerate PC-MRI acquisitions while maintaining flow and velocity measurement accuracy when there is limited temporal variation in the FC data.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

The data acquisition scheme of (a) the standard FCFE PC-MRI and (b) the proposed FCVS approach. The FCVS approach approximately doubles the effective temporal resolution by under-sampling the FC data by a factor of six.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4043787&req=5

Figure 1: The data acquisition scheme of (a) the standard FCFE PC-MRI and (b) the proposed FCVS approach. The FCVS approach approximately doubles the effective temporal resolution by under-sampling the FC data by a factor of six.

Mentions: Phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) is routinely used for quantification of blood flow and velocity in clinical. In a typical PC-MRI exam, flow compensated (FC) and flow encoded (FE) images are alternatively acquired as shown in Figure 1(a). However, in common carotid artery (CCA), FC images are very consistency due to limited physiological motion and background phase changes. In this regard, we propose to accelerate PC-MRI by using sliding window temporal view sharing of the FC data (FCVS) as shown in Figure 1(b). FCVS can improve both the temporal resolution and temporal footprint.


Phase contrast MRI with flow compensation view sharing (FCVS)
The data acquisition scheme of (a) the standard FCFE PC-MRI and (b) the proposed FCVS approach. The FCVS approach approximately doubles the effective temporal resolution by under-sampling the FC data by a factor of six.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4043787&req=5

Figure 1: The data acquisition scheme of (a) the standard FCFE PC-MRI and (b) the proposed FCVS approach. The FCVS approach approximately doubles the effective temporal resolution by under-sampling the FC data by a factor of six.
Mentions: Phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) is routinely used for quantification of blood flow and velocity in clinical. In a typical PC-MRI exam, flow compensated (FC) and flow encoded (FE) images are alternatively acquired as shown in Figure 1(a). However, in common carotid artery (CCA), FC images are very consistency due to limited physiological motion and background phase changes. In this regard, we propose to accelerate PC-MRI by using sliding window temporal view sharing of the FC data (FCVS) as shown in Figure 1(b). FCVS can improve both the temporal resolution and temporal footprint.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

Six healthy volunteers were recruited in the prospective study and were scanned by the standard FCFE PC-MRI sequence and FCVS sequence under free breathing... The peak velocity and total volumetric flow measurements of FCVS are compared with standard FCFE with same temporal resolution but double total acquisition time... An example of a healthy volunteer's peak velocity measurements with: 1) FCFE PC-MRI with 2 views-per-segment and 34 ms temporal resolution, 2) FCVS with 2 views-per-segment and 17 ms-temporal-resolution, and 3) FCFE PC-MRI with 1 view-per-segment with 17 ms-temporal-resolution are shown in Figure 2b... The 34 ms-temporal-resolution FCFE scan failed to capture the maximum peak velocity at around 90 ms into the cardiac cycle... The 17 ms FCVS scan provided similar peak velocity values as the 17 ms FCFE scan albeit at half of the total acquisition time... A Bland-Altman plot of total 24 volumetric flow values (left and right CCA in the six volunteers with 17 ms and 34 ms temporal resolutions) measured by FCVS and standard FCFE PC-MRI are shown in Figure 2c... The bias was 0.05 mL and the 95% confidence interval was [-0.25, 0.35] mL... The bias error in volumetric flow quantification was ≤1.3%... FCVS can accelerate PC-MRI acquisitions while maintaining flow and velocity measurement accuracy when there is limited temporal variation in the FC data.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus