Limits...
Super-resolution reconstruction of late gadolinium enhanced MRI from multiple views

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML

No MeSH data available.


a. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SRR volume. b. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SA volume. Higher quality in SRR is achieved at z-x and z-y planes.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4043209&req=5

Figure 1: a. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SRR volume. b. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SA volume. Higher quality in SRR is achieved at z-x and z-y planes.

Mentions: The SRR volume achieved increased resolution in the through-plane direction (Figure 1). Compared to the SA volume, the SRR volume resulted in significantly reduced scar size estimation for both scar core zone (9.6 ± 7.8 ml vs. 8.7 ± 8.3 ml, p < 0.05) and gray zone (11.9 ± 8.2 ml vs. 7.9 ± 6.0 ml, p < 0.05). Average EAVM bipolar voltage for SRR and original SA volume were in normal myocardium 3.7 ± 3.3 mV versus 3.8 ± 3.3 mV (p = NS); in scar core 0.8 ± 0.6 mV versus 1.0 ± 1.0 mV (p = 0.04) and scar gray zone 1.2 ± 0.8 mV versus 1.6 ± 1.7 mV (p = 0.005). SRR volumes showed better agreement with EAVM (Figure 2).


Super-resolution reconstruction of late gadolinium enhanced MRI from multiple views
a. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SRR volume. b. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SA volume. Higher quality in SRR is achieved at z-x and z-y planes.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4043209&req=5

Figure 1: a. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SRR volume. b. The 3D reconstruction and orthogonal planes from the SA volume. Higher quality in SRR is achieved at z-x and z-y planes.
Mentions: The SRR volume achieved increased resolution in the through-plane direction (Figure 1). Compared to the SA volume, the SRR volume resulted in significantly reduced scar size estimation for both scar core zone (9.6 ± 7.8 ml vs. 8.7 ± 8.3 ml, p < 0.05) and gray zone (11.9 ± 8.2 ml vs. 7.9 ± 6.0 ml, p < 0.05). Average EAVM bipolar voltage for SRR and original SA volume were in normal myocardium 3.7 ± 3.3 mV versus 3.8 ± 3.3 mV (p = NS); in scar core 0.8 ± 0.6 mV versus 1.0 ± 1.0 mV (p = 0.04) and scar gray zone 1.2 ± 0.8 mV versus 1.6 ± 1.7 mV (p = 0.005). SRR volumes showed better agreement with EAVM (Figure 2).

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML

No MeSH data available.