Limits...
A drug use survey among clients of harm reduction sites across British Columbia, Canada, 2012.

Kuo M, Shamsian A, Tzemis D, Buxton JA - Harm Reduct J (2014)

Bottom Line: Respondents surveyed in or near their region's major centre were more likely to report having used crack cocaine (p < 0.0001) and heroin (p < 0.0001) in the past week as compared to those residing >50 km from the major centre.Participating sites found the survey process acceptable, feasible to administer annually, and useful for responding to client needs.Drug use frequencies differed substantially by region and community proximity to the regional centre, underlining the need for locally collected data to inform service planning.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada. margot.kuo@bccdc.ca.

ABSTRACT

Background: In British Columbia (BC), understanding of high-risk drug use trends is largely based on survey and cohort study data from two major cities, which may not be representative of persons who use drugs in other regions. Harm reduction stakeholders, representing each of the five geographic health regions in BC, identified a need for data on drug use to inform local and regional harm reduction activities across the province. The aims of this project were to (1) develop a drug use survey that could be feasibly administered at harm reduction (HR) sites across all health regions and (2) assess the data for differences in reported drug use frequencies by region.

Methods: A pilot survey focusing on current drug use was developed with stakeholders and administered among clients at 28 HR supply distribution sites across the province by existing staff and peers. Data were collated and analysed using univariate and bivariate descriptive statistics to assess differences in reported drug use frequencies by geography. A post-survey evaluation was conducted to assess acceptability and feasibility of the survey process for participating sites.

Results: Crack cocaine, heroin, and morphine were the most frequently reported drugs with notable regional differences. Polysubstance use was common among respondents (70%) with one region having 81% polysubstance use. Respondents surveyed in or near their region's major centre were more likely to report having used crack cocaine (p < 0.0001) and heroin (p < 0.0001) in the past week as compared to those residing >50 km from the major centre. Participants accessing services >50 km from the regional centre were more likely to have used morphine (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in powder cocaine use by client/site proximity to the regional centre. Participating sites found the survey process acceptable, feasible to administer annually, and useful for responding to client needs.

Conclusions: The survey was a feasible way for harm reduction sites across BC to obtain drug use data from clients who actively use drugs. Drug use frequencies differed substantially by region and community proximity to the regional centre, underlining the need for locally collected data to inform service planning.

Show MeSH
Four drugs by health region. Percentage of respondents reporting use of crack cocaine, heroin, morphine, and powder cocaine by health region, BC, 2012 (N = 698).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4016659&req=5

Figure 4: Four drugs by health region. Percentage of respondents reporting use of crack cocaine, heroin, morphine, and powder cocaine by health region, BC, 2012 (N = 698).

Mentions: Crack was found to be the most common drug reported among respondents in three of the five regional health authorities (Figure 4)—Vancouver Coastal, Vancouver Island, and Northern Health Authorities. In the Interior health region, heroin and morphine use were slightly higher than crack use. A high proportion of Fraser respondents reported heroin use, followed by crack, with comparatively low levels of powder cocaine and morphine use. Northern respondents had the highest proportion of morphine use, and this was the only health region in which powder cocaine use was higher than heroin use.


A drug use survey among clients of harm reduction sites across British Columbia, Canada, 2012.

Kuo M, Shamsian A, Tzemis D, Buxton JA - Harm Reduct J (2014)

Four drugs by health region. Percentage of respondents reporting use of crack cocaine, heroin, morphine, and powder cocaine by health region, BC, 2012 (N = 698).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4016659&req=5

Figure 4: Four drugs by health region. Percentage of respondents reporting use of crack cocaine, heroin, morphine, and powder cocaine by health region, BC, 2012 (N = 698).
Mentions: Crack was found to be the most common drug reported among respondents in three of the five regional health authorities (Figure 4)—Vancouver Coastal, Vancouver Island, and Northern Health Authorities. In the Interior health region, heroin and morphine use were slightly higher than crack use. A high proportion of Fraser respondents reported heroin use, followed by crack, with comparatively low levels of powder cocaine and morphine use. Northern respondents had the highest proportion of morphine use, and this was the only health region in which powder cocaine use was higher than heroin use.

Bottom Line: Respondents surveyed in or near their region's major centre were more likely to report having used crack cocaine (p < 0.0001) and heroin (p < 0.0001) in the past week as compared to those residing >50 km from the major centre.Participating sites found the survey process acceptable, feasible to administer annually, and useful for responding to client needs.Drug use frequencies differed substantially by region and community proximity to the regional centre, underlining the need for locally collected data to inform service planning.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada. margot.kuo@bccdc.ca.

ABSTRACT

Background: In British Columbia (BC), understanding of high-risk drug use trends is largely based on survey and cohort study data from two major cities, which may not be representative of persons who use drugs in other regions. Harm reduction stakeholders, representing each of the five geographic health regions in BC, identified a need for data on drug use to inform local and regional harm reduction activities across the province. The aims of this project were to (1) develop a drug use survey that could be feasibly administered at harm reduction (HR) sites across all health regions and (2) assess the data for differences in reported drug use frequencies by region.

Methods: A pilot survey focusing on current drug use was developed with stakeholders and administered among clients at 28 HR supply distribution sites across the province by existing staff and peers. Data were collated and analysed using univariate and bivariate descriptive statistics to assess differences in reported drug use frequencies by geography. A post-survey evaluation was conducted to assess acceptability and feasibility of the survey process for participating sites.

Results: Crack cocaine, heroin, and morphine were the most frequently reported drugs with notable regional differences. Polysubstance use was common among respondents (70%) with one region having 81% polysubstance use. Respondents surveyed in or near their region's major centre were more likely to report having used crack cocaine (p < 0.0001) and heroin (p < 0.0001) in the past week as compared to those residing >50 km from the major centre. Participants accessing services >50 km from the regional centre were more likely to have used morphine (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in powder cocaine use by client/site proximity to the regional centre. Participating sites found the survey process acceptable, feasible to administer annually, and useful for responding to client needs.

Conclusions: The survey was a feasible way for harm reduction sites across BC to obtain drug use data from clients who actively use drugs. Drug use frequencies differed substantially by region and community proximity to the regional centre, underlining the need for locally collected data to inform service planning.

Show MeSH