Limits...
Roosting and foraging social structure of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis).

Silvis A, Kniowski AB, Gehrt SD, Ford WM - PLoS ONE (2014)

Bottom Line: We found the colony roosting network was highly centralized in both years and that roost and social networks differed significantly from random networks.In contrast, whole colony foraging area use was similar between years.Detailed knowledge of the relationships between social and spatial aspects of bat ecology could greatly increase conservation effectiveness by allowing more structured approaches to roost and habitat retention for tree-roosting, socially-aggregating bat species.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

ABSTRACT
Social dynamics are an important but poorly understood aspect of bat ecology. Herein we use a combination of graph theoretic and spatial approaches to describe the roost and social network characteristics and foraging associations of an Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) maternity colony in an agricultural landscape in Ohio, USA. We tracked 46 bats to 50 roosts (423 total relocations) and collected 2,306 foraging locations for 40 bats during the summers of 2009 and 2010. We found the colony roosting network was highly centralized in both years and that roost and social networks differed significantly from random networks. Roost and social network structure also differed substantially between years. Social network structure appeared to be unrelated to segregation of roosts between age classes. For bats whose individual foraging ranges were calculated, many shared foraging space with at least one other bat. Compared across all possible bat dyads, 47% and 43% of the dyads showed more than expected overlap of foraging areas in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Colony roosting area differed between years, but the roosting area centroid shifted only 332 m. In contrast, whole colony foraging area use was similar between years. Random roost removal simulations suggest that Indiana bat colonies may be robust to loss of a limited number of roosts but may respond differently from year to year. Our study emphasizes the utility of graphic theoretic and spatial approaches for examining the sociality and roosting behavior of bats. Detailed knowledge of the relationships between social and spatial aspects of bat ecology could greatly increase conservation effectiveness by allowing more structured approaches to roost and habitat retention for tree-roosting, socially-aggregating bat species.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Roost removal impacts on Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) network fragmentation.Simulated effect of roost removal on the fragmentation of an Indiana bat maternity colony roost network in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Random roost removal was performed 1,000 times per proportion of roosts removed; lines represent mean ± standard error number of networks after node removal.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4016147&req=5

pone-0096937-g007: Roost removal impacts on Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) network fragmentation.Simulated effect of roost removal on the fragmentation of an Indiana bat maternity colony roost network in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Random roost removal was performed 1,000 times per proportion of roosts removed; lines represent mean ± standard error number of networks after node removal.

Mentions: In 2009, the number of network fragments was linearly related to the proportion of roosts removed, with removal of approximately 5% of roosts generating a 50% chance (number of networks = 1.5) of network fragmentation (Figure 7). Similarly, the number of components was linearly related to the proportion of roosts removed in 2010, but less severely so as removal of approximately 30% of roosts was required to generate a 50% chance of network fragmentation. Targeted removal of the most central roost generated 4 network components in 2009 and 2 components in 2010.


Roosting and foraging social structure of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis).

Silvis A, Kniowski AB, Gehrt SD, Ford WM - PLoS ONE (2014)

Roost removal impacts on Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) network fragmentation.Simulated effect of roost removal on the fragmentation of an Indiana bat maternity colony roost network in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Random roost removal was performed 1,000 times per proportion of roosts removed; lines represent mean ± standard error number of networks after node removal.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4016147&req=5

pone-0096937-g007: Roost removal impacts on Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) network fragmentation.Simulated effect of roost removal on the fragmentation of an Indiana bat maternity colony roost network in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Random roost removal was performed 1,000 times per proportion of roosts removed; lines represent mean ± standard error number of networks after node removal.
Mentions: In 2009, the number of network fragments was linearly related to the proportion of roosts removed, with removal of approximately 5% of roosts generating a 50% chance (number of networks = 1.5) of network fragmentation (Figure 7). Similarly, the number of components was linearly related to the proportion of roosts removed in 2010, but less severely so as removal of approximately 30% of roosts was required to generate a 50% chance of network fragmentation. Targeted removal of the most central roost generated 4 network components in 2009 and 2 components in 2010.

Bottom Line: We found the colony roosting network was highly centralized in both years and that roost and social networks differed significantly from random networks.In contrast, whole colony foraging area use was similar between years.Detailed knowledge of the relationships between social and spatial aspects of bat ecology could greatly increase conservation effectiveness by allowing more structured approaches to roost and habitat retention for tree-roosting, socially-aggregating bat species.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

ABSTRACT
Social dynamics are an important but poorly understood aspect of bat ecology. Herein we use a combination of graph theoretic and spatial approaches to describe the roost and social network characteristics and foraging associations of an Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) maternity colony in an agricultural landscape in Ohio, USA. We tracked 46 bats to 50 roosts (423 total relocations) and collected 2,306 foraging locations for 40 bats during the summers of 2009 and 2010. We found the colony roosting network was highly centralized in both years and that roost and social networks differed significantly from random networks. Roost and social network structure also differed substantially between years. Social network structure appeared to be unrelated to segregation of roosts between age classes. For bats whose individual foraging ranges were calculated, many shared foraging space with at least one other bat. Compared across all possible bat dyads, 47% and 43% of the dyads showed more than expected overlap of foraging areas in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Colony roosting area differed between years, but the roosting area centroid shifted only 332 m. In contrast, whole colony foraging area use was similar between years. Random roost removal simulations suggest that Indiana bat colonies may be robust to loss of a limited number of roosts but may respond differently from year to year. Our study emphasizes the utility of graphic theoretic and spatial approaches for examining the sociality and roosting behavior of bats. Detailed knowledge of the relationships between social and spatial aspects of bat ecology could greatly increase conservation effectiveness by allowing more structured approaches to roost and habitat retention for tree-roosting, socially-aggregating bat species.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus