Limits...
Antibiotic expected effectiveness and cost under real life microbiology: evaluation of ertapenem and ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia for elderly patients in Spain.

Grau S, Lozano V, Valladares A, Cavanillas R, Xie Y, Nocea G - Clinicoecon Outcomes Res (2014)

Bottom Line: First-line treatment of CAP with ertapenem led to a higher proportion of successfully treated patients compared with ceftriaxone in Spain.Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ertapenem can be a cost-saving strategy compared with ceftriaxone, with a 59% probability of being dominant (lower costs with additional health benefits) for both, elderly patients (>65 years) and patients with PSI >3.The treatment with ertapenem compared with ceftriaxone resulted in better clinical outcomes and lower treatment costs for two segments of the Spanish population: elderly patients and patients with severe pneumonia (PSI >3).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical efficacy of antibiotics may be affected by changes in the susceptibility of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents. The purpose of this study is to assess how these changes could affect the initial efficacy of ertapenem and ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients and the potential consequences this may have in health care costs.

Methods: Initial efficacy in elderly was obtained from a combined analysis of two multicenter, randomized studies. An alternative scenario was carried out using initial efficacy data according to the pneumonia severity index (PSI). Country-specific pathogens distribution was obtained from a national epidemiological study, and microbiological susceptibilities to first- and second-line therapies were obtained from Spanish or European surveillance studies. A decision analytic model was used to compare ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for CAP inpatient treatment. Inputs of the model were the expected effectiveness previously estimated and resource use considering a Spanish national health system perspective. Outcomes include difference in proportion of successfully treated patients and difference in total costs between ertapenem and ceftriaxone. The model performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: First-line treatment of CAP with ertapenem led to a higher proportion of successfully treated patients compared with ceftriaxone in Spain. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that length of stay was the key parameter of the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ertapenem can be a cost-saving strategy compared with ceftriaxone, with a 59% probability of being dominant (lower costs with additional health benefits) for both, elderly patients (>65 years) and patients with PSI >3.

Conclusion: The incorporation of the current antimicrobial susceptibility into the initial clinical efficacy has a significant impact in outcomes and costs in CAP treatment. The treatment with ertapenem compared with ceftriaxone resulted in better clinical outcomes and lower treatment costs for two segments of the Spanish population: elderly patients and patients with severe pneumonia (PSI >3).

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Tornado diagram for the base-case.Abbreviation: BC, base-case.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3928454&req=5

f4-ceor-6-083: Tornado diagram for the base-case.Abbreviation: BC, base-case.

Mentions: The results obtained for the other parameters are represented for the base-case in the tornado diagram of Figure 4. As can be seen in this chart, where the variables tested in the sensitivity analysis are ordered according to their (decreasing) impact on the result, the variables with the largest impact on the result are the treatment cost with ertapenem and the unit cost per day of hospitalization. Nevertheless, changes in these two variables within the ±10% range do not produce a change in the outcomes, resulting in a cost reduction for both variables across the whole tested range (as it also happened for all other variables in the sensitivity analysis).


Antibiotic expected effectiveness and cost under real life microbiology: evaluation of ertapenem and ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia for elderly patients in Spain.

Grau S, Lozano V, Valladares A, Cavanillas R, Xie Y, Nocea G - Clinicoecon Outcomes Res (2014)

Tornado diagram for the base-case.Abbreviation: BC, base-case.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3928454&req=5

f4-ceor-6-083: Tornado diagram for the base-case.Abbreviation: BC, base-case.
Mentions: The results obtained for the other parameters are represented for the base-case in the tornado diagram of Figure 4. As can be seen in this chart, where the variables tested in the sensitivity analysis are ordered according to their (decreasing) impact on the result, the variables with the largest impact on the result are the treatment cost with ertapenem and the unit cost per day of hospitalization. Nevertheless, changes in these two variables within the ±10% range do not produce a change in the outcomes, resulting in a cost reduction for both variables across the whole tested range (as it also happened for all other variables in the sensitivity analysis).

Bottom Line: First-line treatment of CAP with ertapenem led to a higher proportion of successfully treated patients compared with ceftriaxone in Spain.Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ertapenem can be a cost-saving strategy compared with ceftriaxone, with a 59% probability of being dominant (lower costs with additional health benefits) for both, elderly patients (>65 years) and patients with PSI >3.The treatment with ertapenem compared with ceftriaxone resulted in better clinical outcomes and lower treatment costs for two segments of the Spanish population: elderly patients and patients with severe pneumonia (PSI >3).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical efficacy of antibiotics may be affected by changes in the susceptibility of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents. The purpose of this study is to assess how these changes could affect the initial efficacy of ertapenem and ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients and the potential consequences this may have in health care costs.

Methods: Initial efficacy in elderly was obtained from a combined analysis of two multicenter, randomized studies. An alternative scenario was carried out using initial efficacy data according to the pneumonia severity index (PSI). Country-specific pathogens distribution was obtained from a national epidemiological study, and microbiological susceptibilities to first- and second-line therapies were obtained from Spanish or European surveillance studies. A decision analytic model was used to compare ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for CAP inpatient treatment. Inputs of the model were the expected effectiveness previously estimated and resource use considering a Spanish national health system perspective. Outcomes include difference in proportion of successfully treated patients and difference in total costs between ertapenem and ceftriaxone. The model performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: First-line treatment of CAP with ertapenem led to a higher proportion of successfully treated patients compared with ceftriaxone in Spain. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that length of stay was the key parameter of the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ertapenem can be a cost-saving strategy compared with ceftriaxone, with a 59% probability of being dominant (lower costs with additional health benefits) for both, elderly patients (>65 years) and patients with PSI >3.

Conclusion: The incorporation of the current antimicrobial susceptibility into the initial clinical efficacy has a significant impact in outcomes and costs in CAP treatment. The treatment with ertapenem compared with ceftriaxone resulted in better clinical outcomes and lower treatment costs for two segments of the Spanish population: elderly patients and patients with severe pneumonia (PSI >3).

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus