Limits...
Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.

Wang J, Azziz A, Fan B, Malkov S, Klifa C, Newitt D, Yitta S, Hylton N, Kerlikowske K, Shepherd JA - PLoS ONE (2013)

Bottom Line: Women were selected from the UCSF Medical Center screening population that had received both a screening MRI and digital mammogram within one year of each other, had Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments of normal or benign finding, and no history of breast cancer or surgery.The kappa statistics for all percent density measures were highest in the comparisons of the SXA and MRI results.Automated volumetric fibroglandular tissue measures from screening digital mammograms were in substantial agreement with MRI and if associated with breast cancer could be used in clinical practice to enhance risk assessment and prevention.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical scores of mammographic breast density are highly subjective. Automated technologies for mammography exist to quantify breast density objectively, but the technique that most accurately measures the quantity of breast fibroglandular tissue is not known.

Purpose: To compare the agreement of three automated mammographic techniques for measuring volumetric breast density with a quantitative volumetric MRI-based technique in a screening population.

Materials and methods: Women were selected from the UCSF Medical Center screening population that had received both a screening MRI and digital mammogram within one year of each other, had Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments of normal or benign finding, and no history of breast cancer or surgery. Agreement was assessed of three mammographic techniques (Single-energy X-ray Absorptiometry [SXA], Quantra, and Volpara) with MRI for percent fibroglandular tissue volume, absolute fibroglandular tissue volume, and total breast volume.

Results: Among 99 women, the automated mammographic density techniques were correlated with MRI measures with R(2) values ranging from 0.40 (log fibroglandular volume) to 0.91 (total breast volume). Substantial agreement measured by kappa statistic was found between all percent fibroglandular tissue measures (0.72 to 0.63), but only moderate agreement for log fibroglandular volumes. The kappa statistics for all percent density measures were highest in the comparisons of the SXA and MRI results. The largest error source between MRI and the mammography techniques was found to be differences in measures of total breast volume.

Conclusion: Automated volumetric fibroglandular tissue measures from screening digital mammograms were in substantial agreement with MRI and if associated with breast cancer could be used in clinical practice to enhance risk assessment and prevention.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Validation of SXA model using breast biology and adipose volume estimates from MRI.The amount of water volume in the MRI adipose volume was estimated to be 15% of the volume, which is consistent with previous work estimating it to be between 8% [34] and 20% [35]. The MRI model does not include adipose density in the fibroglandular volume while SXA does. Subtracting out the adipose water volume from the SXA fibroglandular volume improved the agreement between SXA and MRI from R2 = 0.78 to 0.83 and removed most of the bias between the measures.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3852736&req=5

pone-0081653-g003: Validation of SXA model using breast biology and adipose volume estimates from MRI.The amount of water volume in the MRI adipose volume was estimated to be 15% of the volume, which is consistent with previous work estimating it to be between 8% [34] and 20% [35]. The MRI model does not include adipose density in the fibroglandular volume while SXA does. Subtracting out the adipose water volume from the SXA fibroglandular volume improved the agreement between SXA and MRI from R2 = 0.78 to 0.83 and removed most of the bias between the measures.

Mentions: In the modified SXA model, where adipose water volume was subtracted from the measures (Figure 3), the best fit slope for log FGV improved from 0.65 to 1.012 and the intercept term decreased from 2.2 to 0.27 (not significant). The best fit slope for SXA %FGV changed from 0.91 to 1.015, and the intercept term decreased from 13.2 to −2.2 (not significant). Agreement between SXA and MRI %FGV improved slightly from κ = 0.72 to 0.74 (not shown).


Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.

Wang J, Azziz A, Fan B, Malkov S, Klifa C, Newitt D, Yitta S, Hylton N, Kerlikowske K, Shepherd JA - PLoS ONE (2013)

Validation of SXA model using breast biology and adipose volume estimates from MRI.The amount of water volume in the MRI adipose volume was estimated to be 15% of the volume, which is consistent with previous work estimating it to be between 8% [34] and 20% [35]. The MRI model does not include adipose density in the fibroglandular volume while SXA does. Subtracting out the adipose water volume from the SXA fibroglandular volume improved the agreement between SXA and MRI from R2 = 0.78 to 0.83 and removed most of the bias between the measures.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3852736&req=5

pone-0081653-g003: Validation of SXA model using breast biology and adipose volume estimates from MRI.The amount of water volume in the MRI adipose volume was estimated to be 15% of the volume, which is consistent with previous work estimating it to be between 8% [34] and 20% [35]. The MRI model does not include adipose density in the fibroglandular volume while SXA does. Subtracting out the adipose water volume from the SXA fibroglandular volume improved the agreement between SXA and MRI from R2 = 0.78 to 0.83 and removed most of the bias between the measures.
Mentions: In the modified SXA model, where adipose water volume was subtracted from the measures (Figure 3), the best fit slope for log FGV improved from 0.65 to 1.012 and the intercept term decreased from 2.2 to 0.27 (not significant). The best fit slope for SXA %FGV changed from 0.91 to 1.015, and the intercept term decreased from 13.2 to −2.2 (not significant). Agreement between SXA and MRI %FGV improved slightly from κ = 0.72 to 0.74 (not shown).

Bottom Line: Women were selected from the UCSF Medical Center screening population that had received both a screening MRI and digital mammogram within one year of each other, had Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments of normal or benign finding, and no history of breast cancer or surgery.The kappa statistics for all percent density measures were highest in the comparisons of the SXA and MRI results.Automated volumetric fibroglandular tissue measures from screening digital mammograms were in substantial agreement with MRI and if associated with breast cancer could be used in clinical practice to enhance risk assessment and prevention.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical scores of mammographic breast density are highly subjective. Automated technologies for mammography exist to quantify breast density objectively, but the technique that most accurately measures the quantity of breast fibroglandular tissue is not known.

Purpose: To compare the agreement of three automated mammographic techniques for measuring volumetric breast density with a quantitative volumetric MRI-based technique in a screening population.

Materials and methods: Women were selected from the UCSF Medical Center screening population that had received both a screening MRI and digital mammogram within one year of each other, had Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments of normal or benign finding, and no history of breast cancer or surgery. Agreement was assessed of three mammographic techniques (Single-energy X-ray Absorptiometry [SXA], Quantra, and Volpara) with MRI for percent fibroglandular tissue volume, absolute fibroglandular tissue volume, and total breast volume.

Results: Among 99 women, the automated mammographic density techniques were correlated with MRI measures with R(2) values ranging from 0.40 (log fibroglandular volume) to 0.91 (total breast volume). Substantial agreement measured by kappa statistic was found between all percent fibroglandular tissue measures (0.72 to 0.63), but only moderate agreement for log fibroglandular volumes. The kappa statistics for all percent density measures were highest in the comparisons of the SXA and MRI results. The largest error source between MRI and the mammography techniques was found to be differences in measures of total breast volume.

Conclusion: Automated volumetric fibroglandular tissue measures from screening digital mammograms were in substantial agreement with MRI and if associated with breast cancer could be used in clinical practice to enhance risk assessment and prevention.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus