Limits...
Carotid plaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging strongly predicts recurrent ischemia and stroke.

Hosseini AA, Kandiyil N, Macsweeney ST, Altaf N, Auer DP - Ann. Neurol. (2013)

Bottom Line: Cox multivariate regression analysis proved MRIPH as a strong predictor of recurrent ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 12.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8-30.1, p < 0.001) and stroke alone (HR = 35.0, 95% CI = 4.7-261.6, p = 0.001).Meta-analysis of published data confirmed this association between MRIPH and recurrent cerebral ischemic events in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (odds ratio = 12.2, 95% CI = 5.5-27.1, p < 0.00001).The very low stroke risk in patients without MRIPH puts into question current risk-benefit assessment for CEA in this subgroup.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Division of Radiological and Imaging Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier plot) figures confirm predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging–defined plaque hemorrhage (MRIPH) for (A) stroke and (B) all cerebral ischemic events in both (C) moderate-degree carotid artery stenosis and (D) high-degree stenosis. HR = hazard ratio.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3824333&req=5

fig02: Survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier plot) figures confirm predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging–defined plaque hemorrhage (MRIPH) for (A) stroke and (B) all cerebral ischemic events in both (C) moderate-degree carotid artery stenosis and (D) high-degree stenosis. HR = hazard ratio.

Mentions: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly shorter stroke-free survival for the MRIPH+ compared with MRIPH− group (overall chi-square = 28.3, df = 1, p < 0.001; Fig 2A). Univariate Cox regression analysis for stroke confirmed MRIPH to significantly increase the risk of future ipsilateral ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 33.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5–251.3, p = 0.001). Applying backward conditional modeling, adjusted for known vascular risk factors and time from indexed symptoms to MRI, revealed MRIPH as the only significant factor to predict recurrent stroke (HR = 35.0, 95% CI = 4.7–261.6, p = 0.001). Similarly, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis illustrated remarkably different survival curves of participants remaining free of all ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events between those with or without MRIPH (overall chi-square = 41.7, df = 1, p < 0.001; see Fig 2B).


Carotid plaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging strongly predicts recurrent ischemia and stroke.

Hosseini AA, Kandiyil N, Macsweeney ST, Altaf N, Auer DP - Ann. Neurol. (2013)

Survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier plot) figures confirm predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging–defined plaque hemorrhage (MRIPH) for (A) stroke and (B) all cerebral ischemic events in both (C) moderate-degree carotid artery stenosis and (D) high-degree stenosis. HR = hazard ratio.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3824333&req=5

fig02: Survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier plot) figures confirm predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging–defined plaque hemorrhage (MRIPH) for (A) stroke and (B) all cerebral ischemic events in both (C) moderate-degree carotid artery stenosis and (D) high-degree stenosis. HR = hazard ratio.
Mentions: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly shorter stroke-free survival for the MRIPH+ compared with MRIPH− group (overall chi-square = 28.3, df = 1, p < 0.001; Fig 2A). Univariate Cox regression analysis for stroke confirmed MRIPH to significantly increase the risk of future ipsilateral ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 33.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5–251.3, p = 0.001). Applying backward conditional modeling, adjusted for known vascular risk factors and time from indexed symptoms to MRI, revealed MRIPH as the only significant factor to predict recurrent stroke (HR = 35.0, 95% CI = 4.7–261.6, p = 0.001). Similarly, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis illustrated remarkably different survival curves of participants remaining free of all ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events between those with or without MRIPH (overall chi-square = 41.7, df = 1, p < 0.001; see Fig 2B).

Bottom Line: Cox multivariate regression analysis proved MRIPH as a strong predictor of recurrent ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 12.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8-30.1, p < 0.001) and stroke alone (HR = 35.0, 95% CI = 4.7-261.6, p = 0.001).Meta-analysis of published data confirmed this association between MRIPH and recurrent cerebral ischemic events in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (odds ratio = 12.2, 95% CI = 5.5-27.1, p < 0.00001).The very low stroke risk in patients without MRIPH puts into question current risk-benefit assessment for CEA in this subgroup.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Division of Radiological and Imaging Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus