Limits...
Hyperemic stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in mice at 3 Tesla: initial experience and validation against microspheres.

Jogiya R, Makowski M, Phinikaridou A, Patel AS, Jansen C, Zarinabad N, Chiribiri A, Botnar R, Nagel E, Kozerke S, Plein S - J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2013)

Bottom Line: There was good agreement between cardiovascular magnetic resonance CMR and microspheres with no significant difference (P = 0.84).Rest and stress MBF values were consistent with existing literature and perfusion reserve correlated closely to microsphere analysis.Data were acquired on a 3 Tesla scanner using an approach similar to clinical acquisition protocols, potentially facilitating translation of imaging findings between rodent and human studies.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Background: Dynamic first pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion is the standard CMR method for the estimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MBF reserve in man, but it is challenging in rodents because of the high temporal and spatial resolution requirements. Hyperemic first pass myocardial perfusion CMR during vasodilator stress in mice has not been reported.

Methods: Five C57BL/6 J mice were scanned on a clinical 3.0 Tesla Achieva system (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). Vasodilator stress was induced via a tail vein catheter with an injection of dipyridamole. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging (Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg) was based on a saturation recovery spoiled gradient echo method with 10-fold k-space and time domain undersampling (k-t PCA). One week later the mice underwent repeat anaesthesia and LV injections of fluorescent microspheres at rest and at stress. Microspheres were analysed using confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

Results: Mean MBF at rest measured by Fermi-function constrained deconvolution was 4.1 ± 0.5 ml/g/min and increased to 9.6 ± 2.5 ml/g/min during dipyridamole stress (P = 0.005). The myocardial perfusion reserve was 2.4 ± 0.54. The mean count ratio of stress to rest microspheres was 2.4 ± 0.51 using confocal microscopy and 2.6 ± 0.46 using fluorescence. There was good agreement between cardiovascular magnetic resonance CMR and microspheres with no significant difference (P = 0.84).

Conclusion: First-pass myocardial stress perfusion CMR in a mouse model is feasible at 3 Tesla. Rest and stress MBF values were consistent with existing literature and perfusion reserve correlated closely to microsphere analysis. Data were acquired on a 3 Tesla scanner using an approach similar to clinical acquisition protocols, potentially facilitating translation of imaging findings between rodent and human studies.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Comparison of the different methods (confocal microscopy, MR and flow cytometry) of assessing perfusion reserve.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3750232&req=5

Figure 8: Comparison of the different methods (confocal microscopy, MR and flow cytometry) of assessing perfusion reserve.

Mentions: The remaining myocardium was digested and sampled for flow cytometry analysis to calculate the relative number of microspheres and to determine a perfusion reserve (Figure 7). The overall mean perfusion reserve was 2.6 ± 1.01, which showed good agreement, but higher variability, compared with the other techniques (Figure 8). Using Pearson’s correlation, there was a strong association between MPR estimated by CMR and count ratio by flow cytometry (R = 0.74) and no significant difference was observed. On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias for MPR estimation between CMR and microscopy was −0.26 (95% limit of agreement −1.69 to 0.73) (Figure 6b).


Hyperemic stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in mice at 3 Tesla: initial experience and validation against microspheres.

Jogiya R, Makowski M, Phinikaridou A, Patel AS, Jansen C, Zarinabad N, Chiribiri A, Botnar R, Nagel E, Kozerke S, Plein S - J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2013)

Comparison of the different methods (confocal microscopy, MR and flow cytometry) of assessing perfusion reserve.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3750232&req=5

Figure 8: Comparison of the different methods (confocal microscopy, MR and flow cytometry) of assessing perfusion reserve.
Mentions: The remaining myocardium was digested and sampled for flow cytometry analysis to calculate the relative number of microspheres and to determine a perfusion reserve (Figure 7). The overall mean perfusion reserve was 2.6 ± 1.01, which showed good agreement, but higher variability, compared with the other techniques (Figure 8). Using Pearson’s correlation, there was a strong association between MPR estimated by CMR and count ratio by flow cytometry (R = 0.74) and no significant difference was observed. On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias for MPR estimation between CMR and microscopy was −0.26 (95% limit of agreement −1.69 to 0.73) (Figure 6b).

Bottom Line: There was good agreement between cardiovascular magnetic resonance CMR and microspheres with no significant difference (P = 0.84).Rest and stress MBF values were consistent with existing literature and perfusion reserve correlated closely to microsphere analysis.Data were acquired on a 3 Tesla scanner using an approach similar to clinical acquisition protocols, potentially facilitating translation of imaging findings between rodent and human studies.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Background: Dynamic first pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion is the standard CMR method for the estimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MBF reserve in man, but it is challenging in rodents because of the high temporal and spatial resolution requirements. Hyperemic first pass myocardial perfusion CMR during vasodilator stress in mice has not been reported.

Methods: Five C57BL/6 J mice were scanned on a clinical 3.0 Tesla Achieva system (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). Vasodilator stress was induced via a tail vein catheter with an injection of dipyridamole. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging (Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg) was based on a saturation recovery spoiled gradient echo method with 10-fold k-space and time domain undersampling (k-t PCA). One week later the mice underwent repeat anaesthesia and LV injections of fluorescent microspheres at rest and at stress. Microspheres were analysed using confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

Results: Mean MBF at rest measured by Fermi-function constrained deconvolution was 4.1 ± 0.5 ml/g/min and increased to 9.6 ± 2.5 ml/g/min during dipyridamole stress (P = 0.005). The myocardial perfusion reserve was 2.4 ± 0.54. The mean count ratio of stress to rest microspheres was 2.4 ± 0.51 using confocal microscopy and 2.6 ± 0.46 using fluorescence. There was good agreement between cardiovascular magnetic resonance CMR and microspheres with no significant difference (P = 0.84).

Conclusion: First-pass myocardial stress perfusion CMR in a mouse model is feasible at 3 Tesla. Rest and stress MBF values were consistent with existing literature and perfusion reserve correlated closely to microsphere analysis. Data were acquired on a 3 Tesla scanner using an approach similar to clinical acquisition protocols, potentially facilitating translation of imaging findings between rodent and human studies.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus