Limits...
Analysis of the cost effectiveness of a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge.

Atkins Whitmer D, Woods DL - Crisis (2013)

Bottom Line: Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects.Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%.Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Human Cognitive Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, VA Northern California Healthcare Outpatient Clinic, Martinez, CA 94553, USA. dayna.whitmer@va.gov

ABSTRACT

Background: The Golden Gate Bridge (GGB) is a well-known "suicide magnet" and the site of approximately 30 suicides per year. Recently, a suicide barrier was approved to prevent further suicides.

Aims: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the proposed suicide barrier, we compared the proposed costs of the barrier over a 20-year period ($51.6 million) to estimated reductions in mortality.

Method: We reviewed San Francisco and Golden Gate Bridge suicides over a 70-year period (1936-2006). We assumed that all suicides prevented by the barrier would attempt suicide with alternative methods and estimated the mortality reduction based on the difference in lethality between GGB jumps and other suicide methods. Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects.

Results: GGB suicides occur at a rate of approximately 30 per year, with a lethality of 98%. Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%. Assuming that unsuccessful suicides eventually committed suicide at previously reported (12-13%) rates, approximately 286 lives would be saved over a 20-year period at an average cost/life of approximately $180,419 i.e., roughly 6% of US Department of Transportation minimal VSL estimate ($3.2 million).

Conclusions: Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Golden Gate Bridge suicide victims as percentage of county of residence compared topercentage of county population for San Francisco Bay Area.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3643780&req=5

fig4: Golden Gate Bridge suicide victims as percentage of county of residence compared topercentage of county population for San Francisco Bay Area.

Mentions: Figure 4shows the county of residence of Bay Areasuicide victims. Overall, 34% were from San Francisco County, and 17%from Marin County, with other counties contributing less than 11% to thetotal. Although San Francisco and Marin county residents represent the majorityof GGB victims (51%), they account for only 15.5% of the Bay Areapopulation (2000 census, United StatesCensus Bureau, 2000). Accessibility appears to play animportant role: San Francisco and Marin Counties lie at the opposite ends of theGGB.


Analysis of the cost effectiveness of a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge.

Atkins Whitmer D, Woods DL - Crisis (2013)

Golden Gate Bridge suicide victims as percentage of county of residence compared topercentage of county population for San Francisco Bay Area.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3643780&req=5

fig4: Golden Gate Bridge suicide victims as percentage of county of residence compared topercentage of county population for San Francisco Bay Area.
Mentions: Figure 4shows the county of residence of Bay Areasuicide victims. Overall, 34% were from San Francisco County, and 17%from Marin County, with other counties contributing less than 11% to thetotal. Although San Francisco and Marin county residents represent the majorityof GGB victims (51%), they account for only 15.5% of the Bay Areapopulation (2000 census, United StatesCensus Bureau, 2000). Accessibility appears to play animportant role: San Francisco and Marin Counties lie at the opposite ends of theGGB.

Bottom Line: Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects.Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%.Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Human Cognitive Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, VA Northern California Healthcare Outpatient Clinic, Martinez, CA 94553, USA. dayna.whitmer@va.gov

ABSTRACT

Background: The Golden Gate Bridge (GGB) is a well-known "suicide magnet" and the site of approximately 30 suicides per year. Recently, a suicide barrier was approved to prevent further suicides.

Aims: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the proposed suicide barrier, we compared the proposed costs of the barrier over a 20-year period ($51.6 million) to estimated reductions in mortality.

Method: We reviewed San Francisco and Golden Gate Bridge suicides over a 70-year period (1936-2006). We assumed that all suicides prevented by the barrier would attempt suicide with alternative methods and estimated the mortality reduction based on the difference in lethality between GGB jumps and other suicide methods. Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects.

Results: GGB suicides occur at a rate of approximately 30 per year, with a lethality of 98%. Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%. Assuming that unsuccessful suicides eventually committed suicide at previously reported (12-13%) rates, approximately 286 lives would be saved over a 20-year period at an average cost/life of approximately $180,419 i.e., roughly 6% of US Department of Transportation minimal VSL estimate ($3.2 million).

Conclusions: Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus