Limits...
Clinico-radiological and pathological evaluation of extra testicular scrotal lesions.

Mukherjee S, Maheshwari V, Khan R, Rizvi SA, Alam K, Harris SH, Sharma R - J Cytol (2013)

Bottom Line: Apart from distinguishing extratesticular from testicular and cystic from solid lesions, it has an important role in identifying individual lesions, thus reducing the list of differential diagnosis.It helps classify cystic masses on the basis of their contents and defines the etiology of chronic inflammatory lesions, apart from corroborating with the clinico-radiological diagnosis.Histological evaluation was possible only in cases where surgery was performed and helps further define the diagnosis.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.

ABSTRACT

Background: Scrotal ultrasound, though reliable in distinguishing between intratesticular and extratesticular lesions and characterizing them as cystic and solid, cannot distinguish benign from malignant pathology. Although fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has proved to be of great diagnostic importance in testicular lesions, its scope in extratesticular lesions is largely unexplored.

Aim: To evaluate extratesticular scrotal lesions cytologically and compare it with their clinical, radiological, and histological findings.

Materials and methods: Sixty five patients with extratesticular scrotal lesions were assessed clinically, radiologically, and cytologically. Histopathology was done in 45 cases where surgical exploration was undertaken. All the data were then analyzed and correlated.

Results: Extratesticular lesions accounted for 72.2% of the scrotal swellings. Of these, the epididymis is most commonly involved (61.5% cases) with the commonest type of lesion being cystic (49.3% cases). Ultrasonography preferably with color doppler is highly useful for the evaluation of the scrotum. Apart from distinguishing extratesticular from testicular and cystic from solid lesions, it has an important role in identifying individual lesions, thus reducing the list of differential diagnosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology contributed to a definitive diagnosis in 47.7% cases. It helps classify cystic masses on the basis of their contents and defines the etiology of chronic inflammatory lesions, apart from corroborating with the clinico-radiological diagnosis. Histological evaluation was possible only in cases where surgery was performed and helps further define the diagnosis.

Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology is essentially non-traumatic and easy to carry out and should be a technique of choice for the study of scrotal pathology, main advantage being avoidance of delays in diagnosis.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

(a) Scrotal calcinosis – Multinodular, large, yellowish swellings on scrotum; (b) Scrotal calcinosis – Smear shows calcium deposits and few degenerating cells (H and E, ×500); (c) Scrotal calcinosis – Section shows intradermal basophilic calcific masses, with overlying epidermis (H and E, ×50)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3643358&req=5

Figure 4: (a) Scrotal calcinosis – Multinodular, large, yellowish swellings on scrotum; (b) Scrotal calcinosis – Smear shows calcium deposits and few degenerating cells (H and E, ×500); (c) Scrotal calcinosis – Section shows intradermal basophilic calcific masses, with overlying epidermis (H and E, ×50)

Mentions: Histological follow-up was available in 47 (72.3%) of the cases, of which cytological correlation was seen in 44 cases. It was helpful for the definitive diagnosis in 7 cases (10.8%) – one case of tubercular epididymitis turned out to be nonspecific epididymitis. One patient diagnosed as spermatocele on cytology was found to be a case of post-vasectomy syndrome [Figure 2]. It was also helpful for the definitive diagnosis of a case of inflammatory pseudotumor [Figure 3a and b], which was diagnosed as paratesticular neoplasm radiologically and as nonspecific epididymitis cytologically. Three cases showing calcified scrotal mass were diagnosed as scrotal calcinosis [Figure 4a, and c] and one case of scrotal neoplasm was found to be scrotal metastasis from a testicular neoplasm.


Clinico-radiological and pathological evaluation of extra testicular scrotal lesions.

Mukherjee S, Maheshwari V, Khan R, Rizvi SA, Alam K, Harris SH, Sharma R - J Cytol (2013)

(a) Scrotal calcinosis – Multinodular, large, yellowish swellings on scrotum; (b) Scrotal calcinosis – Smear shows calcium deposits and few degenerating cells (H and E, ×500); (c) Scrotal calcinosis – Section shows intradermal basophilic calcific masses, with overlying epidermis (H and E, ×50)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3643358&req=5

Figure 4: (a) Scrotal calcinosis – Multinodular, large, yellowish swellings on scrotum; (b) Scrotal calcinosis – Smear shows calcium deposits and few degenerating cells (H and E, ×500); (c) Scrotal calcinosis – Section shows intradermal basophilic calcific masses, with overlying epidermis (H and E, ×50)
Mentions: Histological follow-up was available in 47 (72.3%) of the cases, of which cytological correlation was seen in 44 cases. It was helpful for the definitive diagnosis in 7 cases (10.8%) – one case of tubercular epididymitis turned out to be nonspecific epididymitis. One patient diagnosed as spermatocele on cytology was found to be a case of post-vasectomy syndrome [Figure 2]. It was also helpful for the definitive diagnosis of a case of inflammatory pseudotumor [Figure 3a and b], which was diagnosed as paratesticular neoplasm radiologically and as nonspecific epididymitis cytologically. Three cases showing calcified scrotal mass were diagnosed as scrotal calcinosis [Figure 4a, and c] and one case of scrotal neoplasm was found to be scrotal metastasis from a testicular neoplasm.

Bottom Line: Apart from distinguishing extratesticular from testicular and cystic from solid lesions, it has an important role in identifying individual lesions, thus reducing the list of differential diagnosis.It helps classify cystic masses on the basis of their contents and defines the etiology of chronic inflammatory lesions, apart from corroborating with the clinico-radiological diagnosis.Histological evaluation was possible only in cases where surgery was performed and helps further define the diagnosis.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.

ABSTRACT

Background: Scrotal ultrasound, though reliable in distinguishing between intratesticular and extratesticular lesions and characterizing them as cystic and solid, cannot distinguish benign from malignant pathology. Although fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has proved to be of great diagnostic importance in testicular lesions, its scope in extratesticular lesions is largely unexplored.

Aim: To evaluate extratesticular scrotal lesions cytologically and compare it with their clinical, radiological, and histological findings.

Materials and methods: Sixty five patients with extratesticular scrotal lesions were assessed clinically, radiologically, and cytologically. Histopathology was done in 45 cases where surgical exploration was undertaken. All the data were then analyzed and correlated.

Results: Extratesticular lesions accounted for 72.2% of the scrotal swellings. Of these, the epididymis is most commonly involved (61.5% cases) with the commonest type of lesion being cystic (49.3% cases). Ultrasonography preferably with color doppler is highly useful for the evaluation of the scrotum. Apart from distinguishing extratesticular from testicular and cystic from solid lesions, it has an important role in identifying individual lesions, thus reducing the list of differential diagnosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology contributed to a definitive diagnosis in 47.7% cases. It helps classify cystic masses on the basis of their contents and defines the etiology of chronic inflammatory lesions, apart from corroborating with the clinico-radiological diagnosis. Histological evaluation was possible only in cases where surgery was performed and helps further define the diagnosis.

Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology is essentially non-traumatic and easy to carry out and should be a technique of choice for the study of scrotal pathology, main advantage being avoidance of delays in diagnosis.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus