Limits...
Bilateral cochlear implantation for children in nagasaki, Japan.

Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Hara M, Sainoo Y, Sato C, Yamamoto-Fukuda T, Yoshida H, Ito A, Tanaka C, Baba K, Nakata A, Tanaka H, Takahashi H - Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2012)

Bottom Line: At every age, a second CI is very effective.These results may show important binaural effectiveness such as binaural summation and head shadow effect.Bilateral CI is very useful medical intervention for many children with severe-to-profound hearing loss in Japan as well as elsewhere.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Kanda ENT Clinic, Nagasaki Bell Hearing Center, Nagasaki, Japan.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The number of patients with bilateral cochlear implant (CI) has gradually increased as patients and/or parents recognize its effectiveness. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the efficacy of 29 bilateral CI out of 169 pediatric CI users, who received auditory-verbal/oral habilitation at our hearing center.

Methods: We evaluated the audiological abilities 29 Japanese children with bilateral CIs including wearing threshold, word recognition score, speech discrimination score at 1 m from front speaker (SP), 1 m from second CI side SP, speech discrimination score under the noise (S/N ratio=80 dB sound pressure level [SPL]/70 dB SPL, 10 dB) at 1 m from front SP, word recognition score under the noise (S/N ratio=80 dB SPL/70 dB SPL, 10 dB) at 1 m from front SP.

Results: Binaural hearing using bilateral CI is better than first CI in all speech understanding tests. Especially, there were significant differences between the results of first CI and bilateral CI on SDS at 70 dB SPL (P=0.02), SDS at 1 m from second CI side SP at 60 dB SPL (P=0.02), word recognition score (WRS) at 1 m from second CI side SP at 60 dB SPL (P=0.02), speech discrimination score (SDS) at 1 m from front SP under the noise (S/N=80/70; P=0.01) and WRS at 1 m from front SP under the noise (S/N=80/70; P=0.002). At every age, a second CI is very effective. However, the results of under 9 years old were better than of over 9 years old on the mean SDS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second CI (P=0.04). About use of a hearing aid (HA) in their opposite side of first CI, on the WRS and SDS under the noise, there were significant differences between the group of over 3 years and the group of under 10 months of HA non user before second CI.

Conclusion: These results may show important binaural effectiveness such as binaural summation and head shadow effect. Bilateral CI is very useful medical intervention for many children with severe-to-profound hearing loss in Japan as well as elsewhere.

No MeSH data available.


Comparison of the mean word recognition score (WRS) and speech discrimination score (SDS), at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from front speaker, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second cochlear implantation for over and under 9 years old. SPL, sound pressure level.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3369978&req=5

Figure 17: Comparison of the mean word recognition score (WRS) and speech discrimination score (SDS), at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from front speaker, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second cochlear implantation for over and under 9 years old. SPL, sound pressure level.

Mentions: We attempted to determine until what age the second CI is effective for better language perception in various situations. We compared the results of over 9 years old with the results of under 9 years old, analyzing the mean WRS and SDS at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from the front SP, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second CI (Fig. 17). The mean SDS under the noise (S/N=80/70) for the second CI (P=0.04*) shows significant differences between the over 9 years old and the under 9 years old.


Bilateral cochlear implantation for children in nagasaki, Japan.

Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Hara M, Sainoo Y, Sato C, Yamamoto-Fukuda T, Yoshida H, Ito A, Tanaka C, Baba K, Nakata A, Tanaka H, Takahashi H - Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2012)

Comparison of the mean word recognition score (WRS) and speech discrimination score (SDS), at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from front speaker, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second cochlear implantation for over and under 9 years old. SPL, sound pressure level.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3369978&req=5

Figure 17: Comparison of the mean word recognition score (WRS) and speech discrimination score (SDS), at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from front speaker, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second cochlear implantation for over and under 9 years old. SPL, sound pressure level.
Mentions: We attempted to determine until what age the second CI is effective for better language perception in various situations. We compared the results of over 9 years old with the results of under 9 years old, analyzing the mean WRS and SDS at 70 dB SPL at 1 m from the front SP, the mean SDS and WRS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second CI (Fig. 17). The mean SDS under the noise (S/N=80/70) for the second CI (P=0.04*) shows significant differences between the over 9 years old and the under 9 years old.

Bottom Line: At every age, a second CI is very effective.These results may show important binaural effectiveness such as binaural summation and head shadow effect.Bilateral CI is very useful medical intervention for many children with severe-to-profound hearing loss in Japan as well as elsewhere.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Kanda ENT Clinic, Nagasaki Bell Hearing Center, Nagasaki, Japan.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The number of patients with bilateral cochlear implant (CI) has gradually increased as patients and/or parents recognize its effectiveness. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the efficacy of 29 bilateral CI out of 169 pediatric CI users, who received auditory-verbal/oral habilitation at our hearing center.

Methods: We evaluated the audiological abilities 29 Japanese children with bilateral CIs including wearing threshold, word recognition score, speech discrimination score at 1 m from front speaker (SP), 1 m from second CI side SP, speech discrimination score under the noise (S/N ratio=80 dB sound pressure level [SPL]/70 dB SPL, 10 dB) at 1 m from front SP, word recognition score under the noise (S/N ratio=80 dB SPL/70 dB SPL, 10 dB) at 1 m from front SP.

Results: Binaural hearing using bilateral CI is better than first CI in all speech understanding tests. Especially, there were significant differences between the results of first CI and bilateral CI on SDS at 70 dB SPL (P=0.02), SDS at 1 m from second CI side SP at 60 dB SPL (P=0.02), word recognition score (WRS) at 1 m from second CI side SP at 60 dB SPL (P=0.02), speech discrimination score (SDS) at 1 m from front SP under the noise (S/N=80/70; P=0.01) and WRS at 1 m from front SP under the noise (S/N=80/70; P=0.002). At every age, a second CI is very effective. However, the results of under 9 years old were better than of over 9 years old on the mean SDS under the noise (S/N=80/70) on second CI (P=0.04). About use of a hearing aid (HA) in their opposite side of first CI, on the WRS and SDS under the noise, there were significant differences between the group of over 3 years and the group of under 10 months of HA non user before second CI.

Conclusion: These results may show important binaural effectiveness such as binaural summation and head shadow effect. Bilateral CI is very useful medical intervention for many children with severe-to-profound hearing loss in Japan as well as elsewhere.

No MeSH data available.