Limits...
Kinetic study of batch and fed-batch enzymatic saccharification of pretreated substrate and subsequent fermentation to ethanol.

Gupta R, Kumar S, Gomes J, Kuhad RC - Biotechnol Biofuels (2012)

Bottom Line: Under batch mode, the actual sugar concentration values at 20% initial substrate consistency were found deviated from the predicted values and the maximum sugar concentration obtained was 80.78 g/L.Furthermore, model simulations showed that higher insoluble solids in the feed resulted in both smaller reactor volume and shorter residence time.Restricting the process to suitable kinetic regimes could result in higher conversion rates.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Lignocellulose Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India. kuhad85@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Background: Enzymatic hydrolysis, the rate limiting step in the process development for biofuel, is always hampered by its low sugar concentration. High solid enzymatic saccharification could solve this problem but has several other drawbacks such as low rate of reaction. In the present study we have attempted to enhance the concentration of sugars in enzymatic hydrolysate of delignified Prosopis juliflora, using a fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis approach.

Results: The enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out at elevated solid loading up to 20% (w/v) and a comparison kinetics of batch and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out using kinetic regimes. Under batch mode, the actual sugar concentration values at 20% initial substrate consistency were found deviated from the predicted values and the maximum sugar concentration obtained was 80.78 g/L. Fed-batch strategy was implemented to enhance the final sugar concentration to 127 g/L. The batch and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysates were fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production of 34.78 g/L and 52.83 g/L, respectively, were achieved. Furthermore, model simulations showed that higher insoluble solids in the feed resulted in both smaller reactor volume and shorter residence time.

Conclusion: Fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis is an efficient procedure for enhancing the sugar concentration in the hydrolysate. Restricting the process to suitable kinetic regimes could result in higher conversion rates.

No MeSH data available.


Fermentation profile of fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3369211&req=5

Figure 8: Fermentation profile of fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate.

Mentions: The fermentation profiles of batch (S4,0 = 20%) and fed-batch (Sc = 20%) enzymatic hydrolysates containing 76.52 ± 2.82 and 117.35 ± 1.14 g/L initial sugars have been shown in Figure 7 and 8. The fermentation of batch enzymatic hydrolysate brought about the production of 34.78 ± 1.10 g/L ethanol with yield and productivity of 0.45 g/g and 3.16 g/L/h, respectively, after 11 h of incubation (Figure 7). Moreover, the biomass production during the fermentation of batch enzymatic hydrolysate increased till 8 h (1.86 ± 0.04 g/L) and then remained almost constant (Figure 7). While, the fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate when fermented with S. cerevisiae, produced 52.83 ± 1.70 g/L ethanol and 4.50 ± 0.004 g/L biomass with an ethanol yield of 0.45 g/g and ethanol productivity of 4.40 g/L/h after 12 h of incubation (Figure 8).


Kinetic study of batch and fed-batch enzymatic saccharification of pretreated substrate and subsequent fermentation to ethanol.

Gupta R, Kumar S, Gomes J, Kuhad RC - Biotechnol Biofuels (2012)

Fermentation profile of fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3369211&req=5

Figure 8: Fermentation profile of fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate.
Mentions: The fermentation profiles of batch (S4,0 = 20%) and fed-batch (Sc = 20%) enzymatic hydrolysates containing 76.52 ± 2.82 and 117.35 ± 1.14 g/L initial sugars have been shown in Figure 7 and 8. The fermentation of batch enzymatic hydrolysate brought about the production of 34.78 ± 1.10 g/L ethanol with yield and productivity of 0.45 g/g and 3.16 g/L/h, respectively, after 11 h of incubation (Figure 7). Moreover, the biomass production during the fermentation of batch enzymatic hydrolysate increased till 8 h (1.86 ± 0.04 g/L) and then remained almost constant (Figure 7). While, the fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysate when fermented with S. cerevisiae, produced 52.83 ± 1.70 g/L ethanol and 4.50 ± 0.004 g/L biomass with an ethanol yield of 0.45 g/g and ethanol productivity of 4.40 g/L/h after 12 h of incubation (Figure 8).

Bottom Line: Under batch mode, the actual sugar concentration values at 20% initial substrate consistency were found deviated from the predicted values and the maximum sugar concentration obtained was 80.78 g/L.Furthermore, model simulations showed that higher insoluble solids in the feed resulted in both smaller reactor volume and shorter residence time.Restricting the process to suitable kinetic regimes could result in higher conversion rates.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Lignocellulose Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India. kuhad85@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Background: Enzymatic hydrolysis, the rate limiting step in the process development for biofuel, is always hampered by its low sugar concentration. High solid enzymatic saccharification could solve this problem but has several other drawbacks such as low rate of reaction. In the present study we have attempted to enhance the concentration of sugars in enzymatic hydrolysate of delignified Prosopis juliflora, using a fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis approach.

Results: The enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out at elevated solid loading up to 20% (w/v) and a comparison kinetics of batch and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out using kinetic regimes. Under batch mode, the actual sugar concentration values at 20% initial substrate consistency were found deviated from the predicted values and the maximum sugar concentration obtained was 80.78 g/L. Fed-batch strategy was implemented to enhance the final sugar concentration to 127 g/L. The batch and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysates were fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production of 34.78 g/L and 52.83 g/L, respectively, were achieved. Furthermore, model simulations showed that higher insoluble solids in the feed resulted in both smaller reactor volume and shorter residence time.

Conclusion: Fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis is an efficient procedure for enhancing the sugar concentration in the hydrolysate. Restricting the process to suitable kinetic regimes could result in higher conversion rates.

No MeSH data available.