Limits...
Immediate placement and functional loading of implants on canine with fixed partial denture for a patient having canine protected occlusion: a case report.

Hong JW, Ahn SG, Leem DH, Seo JM - J Adv Prosthodont (2012)

Bottom Line: Many efforts have been made to minimize the duration of treatment time.Several literatures have documented immediate function with provisional or definitive prosthesis within a week of the placement in response to these demands.This article presents immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets followed by functional immediate loading with provisional prosthesis on canine and premolars for a patient having canine protected occlusion.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

ABSTRACT
Conventional implant protocols required a load-free healing period of three to six months between placement and functional loading of the implants. Many efforts have been made to minimize the duration of treatment time. Several literatures have documented immediate function with provisional or definitive prosthesis within a week of the placement in response to these demands. In addition, immediate implant placement has advantages such as shortened treatment time and preservation of soft tissue architectures. This article presents immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets followed by functional immediate loading with provisional prosthesis on canine and premolars for a patient having canine protected occlusion.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Occlusal view of the definitive restoration in place.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3303921&req=5

Figure 9: Occlusal view of the definitive restoration in place.

Mentions: Four months after the implant placement, clinical and radiographic examination of maxilla and mandible revealed successful osseointegration. Definitive prostheses were constructed with zirconia abutment (Zirealpost, The Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) and pressable all-ceramic restoration (IPS-Empress II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in response to the patient's high esthetic expectation. After taking implant level impression, master cast was poured and mounted using facebow transfer. Zirconia abutments were milled and definitive prostheses with canine guided occlusion were made with IPS- Empress II system. Definitive restorations were tried-in intraorally. Zirconia abutments were tightened to 20 Ncm of torque following the manufacturer's recommendation (Fig. 7). Definitive restorations were permanently cemented with resin cement (Rely-X Unicem, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) after finishing and polishing (Figs. 8, 9).


Immediate placement and functional loading of implants on canine with fixed partial denture for a patient having canine protected occlusion: a case report.

Hong JW, Ahn SG, Leem DH, Seo JM - J Adv Prosthodont (2012)

Occlusal view of the definitive restoration in place.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3303921&req=5

Figure 9: Occlusal view of the definitive restoration in place.
Mentions: Four months after the implant placement, clinical and radiographic examination of maxilla and mandible revealed successful osseointegration. Definitive prostheses were constructed with zirconia abutment (Zirealpost, The Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) and pressable all-ceramic restoration (IPS-Empress II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in response to the patient's high esthetic expectation. After taking implant level impression, master cast was poured and mounted using facebow transfer. Zirconia abutments were milled and definitive prostheses with canine guided occlusion were made with IPS- Empress II system. Definitive restorations were tried-in intraorally. Zirconia abutments were tightened to 20 Ncm of torque following the manufacturer's recommendation (Fig. 7). Definitive restorations were permanently cemented with resin cement (Rely-X Unicem, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) after finishing and polishing (Figs. 8, 9).

Bottom Line: Many efforts have been made to minimize the duration of treatment time.Several literatures have documented immediate function with provisional or definitive prosthesis within a week of the placement in response to these demands.This article presents immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets followed by functional immediate loading with provisional prosthesis on canine and premolars for a patient having canine protected occlusion.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

ABSTRACT
Conventional implant protocols required a load-free healing period of three to six months between placement and functional loading of the implants. Many efforts have been made to minimize the duration of treatment time. Several literatures have documented immediate function with provisional or definitive prosthesis within a week of the placement in response to these demands. In addition, immediate implant placement has advantages such as shortened treatment time and preservation of soft tissue architectures. This article presents immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets followed by functional immediate loading with provisional prosthesis on canine and premolars for a patient having canine protected occlusion.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus