Limits...
Application of silver nanofluid containing oleic acid surfactant in a thermosyphon economizer.

Parametthanuwat T, Rittidech S, Pattiya A, Ding Y, Witharana S - Nanoscale Res Lett (2011)

Bottom Line: The volumetric flow rates for the coolant (in the condenser) were 1, 2.5, and 5 l/min.The operating temperatures were 60, 70, and 80°C.It was further found that the effectiveness of nanofluid and the OA containing nanofluids were superior in effectiveness over water in all experimental conditions came under this study.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Heat-Pipe and Thermal Tools Design Research Unit (HTDR), Division of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Thailand. s_rittidej@hotmail.com.

ABSTRACT
This article reports a recent study on the application of a two-phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT) in a thermosyphon for economizer (TPEC). The TPEC had three sections of equal size; the evaporator, the adiabatic section, and the condenser, of 250 mm × 250 mm × 250 mm (W × L × H). The TPCT was a steel tube of 12.7-mm ID. The filling ratios chosen to study were 30, 50, and 80% with respect to the evaporator length. The volumetric flow rates for the coolant (in the condenser) were 1, 2.5, and 5 l/min. Five working fluids investigated were: water, water-based silver nanofluid with silver concentration 0.5 w/v%, and the nanofluid (NF) mixed with 0.5, 1, and 1.5 w/v% of oleic acid (OA). The operating temperatures were 60, 70, and 80°C. Experimental data showed that the TPEC gave the highest heat flux of about 25 kW/m2 and the highest effectiveness of about 0.3 at a filling ratio of 50%, with the nanofluid containing 1 w/v% of OA. It was further found that the effectiveness of nanofluid and the OA containing nanofluids were superior in effectiveness over water in all experimental conditions came under this study. Moreover, the presence of OA had clearly contributed to raise the effectiveness of the nanofluid.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Relationship between volumetric flow rate and heat flux. Operating temperature = 80°C, filling ratio = 50%.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3211402&req=5

Figure 7: Relationship between volumetric flow rate and heat flux. Operating temperature = 80°C, filling ratio = 50%.

Mentions: Relationship between the volumetric flow rate and the heat flux of TPEC at 80°C is shown in Figure 7. The heat flux has increased with the volumetric flow rate suggesting that the thermosyphon efficiency increasing with the same. Consider the case of 1 w/v% nanofluid, where at 5 l/min, the resulting heat flux was 25 kW/m2. The increase of the maximum heat flux with the volumetric flow rate can be attributed to the increase of the operating temperature. As the operating temperature increases, the system approaches boiling.


Application of silver nanofluid containing oleic acid surfactant in a thermosyphon economizer.

Parametthanuwat T, Rittidech S, Pattiya A, Ding Y, Witharana S - Nanoscale Res Lett (2011)

Relationship between volumetric flow rate and heat flux. Operating temperature = 80°C, filling ratio = 50%.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3211402&req=5

Figure 7: Relationship between volumetric flow rate and heat flux. Operating temperature = 80°C, filling ratio = 50%.
Mentions: Relationship between the volumetric flow rate and the heat flux of TPEC at 80°C is shown in Figure 7. The heat flux has increased with the volumetric flow rate suggesting that the thermosyphon efficiency increasing with the same. Consider the case of 1 w/v% nanofluid, where at 5 l/min, the resulting heat flux was 25 kW/m2. The increase of the maximum heat flux with the volumetric flow rate can be attributed to the increase of the operating temperature. As the operating temperature increases, the system approaches boiling.

Bottom Line: The volumetric flow rates for the coolant (in the condenser) were 1, 2.5, and 5 l/min.The operating temperatures were 60, 70, and 80°C.It was further found that the effectiveness of nanofluid and the OA containing nanofluids were superior in effectiveness over water in all experimental conditions came under this study.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Heat-Pipe and Thermal Tools Design Research Unit (HTDR), Division of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Thailand. s_rittidej@hotmail.com.

ABSTRACT
This article reports a recent study on the application of a two-phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT) in a thermosyphon for economizer (TPEC). The TPEC had three sections of equal size; the evaporator, the adiabatic section, and the condenser, of 250 mm × 250 mm × 250 mm (W × L × H). The TPCT was a steel tube of 12.7-mm ID. The filling ratios chosen to study were 30, 50, and 80% with respect to the evaporator length. The volumetric flow rates for the coolant (in the condenser) were 1, 2.5, and 5 l/min. Five working fluids investigated were: water, water-based silver nanofluid with silver concentration 0.5 w/v%, and the nanofluid (NF) mixed with 0.5, 1, and 1.5 w/v% of oleic acid (OA). The operating temperatures were 60, 70, and 80°C. Experimental data showed that the TPEC gave the highest heat flux of about 25 kW/m2 and the highest effectiveness of about 0.3 at a filling ratio of 50%, with the nanofluid containing 1 w/v% of OA. It was further found that the effectiveness of nanofluid and the OA containing nanofluids were superior in effectiveness over water in all experimental conditions came under this study. Moreover, the presence of OA had clearly contributed to raise the effectiveness of the nanofluid.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus