Limits...
Phase transition on the Si(001) clean surface prepared in UHV MBE chamber: a study by high-resolution STM and in situ RHEED.

Arapkina LV, Yuryev VA, Chizh KV, Shevlyuga VM, Storojevyh MS, Krylova LA - Nanoscale Res Lett (2011)

Bottom Line: A fraction of the surface area covered by the c(8 × 8) structure decreased, as the sample cooling rate was reduced.A model of the c(8 × 8) structure formation has been built on the basis of the STM data.Origin of the high-order structure on the Si(001) surface and its connection with the epinucleation phenomenon are discussed.PACS 68.35.B-·68.37.Ef·68.49.Jk·68.47.Fg.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: A, M, Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, 38 Vavilov Street, Moscow, 119991, Russia. arapkina@kapella.gpi.ru.

ABSTRACT
The Si(001) surface deoxidized by short annealing at T ~ 925°C in the ultrahigh vacuum molecuar beam epitaxy chamber has been in situ investigated using high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM)and redegreesected high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED. RHEED patterns corresponding to (2 × 1) and (4 × 4) structures were observed during sample treatment. The (4 × 4) reconstruction arose at T ≲ 600°C after annealing. The reconstruction was observed to be reversible: the (4 × 4) structure turned into the (2 × 1) one at T ≳ 600°C, the (4 × 4) structure appeared again at recurring cooling. The c(8 × 8) reconstruction was revealed by STM at room temperature on the same samples. A fraction of the surface area covered by the c(8 × 8) structure decreased, as the sample cooling rate was reduced. The (2 × 1) structure was observed on the surface free of the c(8 × 8) one. The c(8 × 8) structure has been evidenced to manifest itself as the (4 × 4) one in the RHEED patterns. A model of the c(8 × 8) structure formation has been built on the basis of the STM data. Origin of the high-order structure on the Si(001) surface and its connection with the epinucleation phenomenon are discussed.PACS 68.35.B-·68.37.Ef·68.49.Jk·68.47.Fg.

No MeSH data available.


Reflected high-energy electron diffraction patterns: (a) [0 1 0] and (b) [1 1 0] azimuths; electron energies were 9.8 and 9.3 keV, respectively.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3211275&req=5

Figure 4: Reflected high-energy electron diffraction patterns: (a) [0 1 0] and (b) [1 1 0] azimuths; electron energies were 9.8 and 9.3 keV, respectively.

Mentions: Figure 4 demonstrates typical RHEED patterns taken at room temperature from the STM sample annealed for 3 min with further quenching. Characteristic distances on the surface corresponding to the reflex positions in the diffraction pattern were calculated according to ref. [42]. The derived surface structure is (4 × 4). One sample showed the RHEED patterns corresponding to the (2 × 1) structure [42] after the same treatment however.


Phase transition on the Si(001) clean surface prepared in UHV MBE chamber: a study by high-resolution STM and in situ RHEED.

Arapkina LV, Yuryev VA, Chizh KV, Shevlyuga VM, Storojevyh MS, Krylova LA - Nanoscale Res Lett (2011)

Reflected high-energy electron diffraction patterns: (a) [0 1 0] and (b) [1 1 0] azimuths; electron energies were 9.8 and 9.3 keV, respectively.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3211275&req=5

Figure 4: Reflected high-energy electron diffraction patterns: (a) [0 1 0] and (b) [1 1 0] azimuths; electron energies were 9.8 and 9.3 keV, respectively.
Mentions: Figure 4 demonstrates typical RHEED patterns taken at room temperature from the STM sample annealed for 3 min with further quenching. Characteristic distances on the surface corresponding to the reflex positions in the diffraction pattern were calculated according to ref. [42]. The derived surface structure is (4 × 4). One sample showed the RHEED patterns corresponding to the (2 × 1) structure [42] after the same treatment however.

Bottom Line: A fraction of the surface area covered by the c(8 × 8) structure decreased, as the sample cooling rate was reduced.A model of the c(8 × 8) structure formation has been built on the basis of the STM data.Origin of the high-order structure on the Si(001) surface and its connection with the epinucleation phenomenon are discussed.PACS 68.35.B-·68.37.Ef·68.49.Jk·68.47.Fg.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: A, M, Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, 38 Vavilov Street, Moscow, 119991, Russia. arapkina@kapella.gpi.ru.

ABSTRACT
The Si(001) surface deoxidized by short annealing at T ~ 925°C in the ultrahigh vacuum molecuar beam epitaxy chamber has been in situ investigated using high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM)and redegreesected high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED. RHEED patterns corresponding to (2 × 1) and (4 × 4) structures were observed during sample treatment. The (4 × 4) reconstruction arose at T ≲ 600°C after annealing. The reconstruction was observed to be reversible: the (4 × 4) structure turned into the (2 × 1) one at T ≳ 600°C, the (4 × 4) structure appeared again at recurring cooling. The c(8 × 8) reconstruction was revealed by STM at room temperature on the same samples. A fraction of the surface area covered by the c(8 × 8) structure decreased, as the sample cooling rate was reduced. The (2 × 1) structure was observed on the surface free of the c(8 × 8) one. The c(8 × 8) structure has been evidenced to manifest itself as the (4 × 4) one in the RHEED patterns. A model of the c(8 × 8) structure formation has been built on the basis of the STM data. Origin of the high-order structure on the Si(001) surface and its connection with the epinucleation phenomenon are discussed.PACS 68.35.B-·68.37.Ef·68.49.Jk·68.47.Fg.

No MeSH data available.