Limits...
The development of a rapid SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR for detection of Duck circovirus.

Wan C, Huang Y, Cheng L, Fu G, Shi SH, Chen H, Peng C, Lin F, Lin J - Virol. J. (2011)

Bottom Line: The established real time PCR was used to detect 45 DuCV-negative samples, which were tested using conventional PCR under the developed optimal conditions, each 15 for embryonated eggs, non-embryonated budgerigar eggs, newly hatched duck, the mixture of the lung, liver, spleen which were analysis for the presence of DuCV DNA, to conform that whether the DuCV can be transmitted vertically.Meanwhile, no positive result was shown by the real-time PCR method.The SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR can therefore be practically used as an alternative diagnostic tool and a screening method for ducks infected with duck circovirus.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China.

ABSTRACT
This report describes a one-step real-time polymerase chain reaction assay based on SYBR Green I for detection of a broad range of duck circovirus (DuCV). Align with all DuCV complete genome sequences and other Genus Circovirus download from the GenBank (such as goose circovirus, pigeon circovirus), the primers targets to the replicate gene of DuCV were designed. The detection assay was linear in the range of 1.31 × 102-1.31 × 107 copies/μL. The reaction efficiency of the assay using the slope (the slope was -3.349) and the Y-intercept was 37.01 from the linear equation was estimated to be 0.99 and the correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.993. A series of experiments were carried out to assess the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of the assay, following by the low intra-assay and inter-assay CVs for CT values obtained with the standard plasmids. The intra-assay CVs were equal or less than 1.89% and the inter-assay CVs were equal or less than 1.26%. There was no cross-reaction occurred with nucleic acids extracted from RA (Riemerella anatipestifer), E. coli (Escherichia coli), Duck Cholera (Pasteurella multocida), Avian influenza virus, avian paramyxovirus, Muscovy duck parvovirus, Duck reovirus, Duck hepatitis A virus as control templates. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls. The assay was specific and reproducible. The established real time PCR was used to detect 45 DuCV-negative samples, which were tested using conventional PCR under the developed optimal conditions, each 15 for embryonated eggs, non-embryonated budgerigar eggs, newly hatched duck, the mixture of the lung, liver, spleen which were analysis for the presence of DuCV DNA, to conform that whether the DuCV can be transmitted vertically. Meanwhile, no positive result was shown by the real-time PCR method. The SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR can therefore be practically used as an alternative diagnostic tool and a screening method for ducks infected with duck circovirus.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

The specificity of the real-time PCR assay. Negative control including NTC (no template control), RA, E. coli, Duck Cholera, Avian influenza virus (H9 subtype), avian paramyxovirus (AMPV-1), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), Duck reovirus(DRV), Duck hepatitis A virus (DHV), the positive samples showed an identical melting curve profile. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3198713&req=5

Figure 3: The specificity of the real-time PCR assay. Negative control including NTC (no template control), RA, E. coli, Duck Cholera, Avian influenza virus (H9 subtype), avian paramyxovirus (AMPV-1), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), Duck reovirus(DRV), Duck hepatitis A virus (DHV), the positive samples showed an identical melting curve profile. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls.

Mentions: The specificity of the assay was examined with regard to the nucleic acids extracted from RA (Riemerella anatipestifer), E. coli (Escherichia coli), Duck Cholera (Pasteurella multocida), Avian influenza virus, avian paramyxovirus, Muscovy duck parvovirus, Duck reovirus, Duck hepatitis A virus, were run under the optimal conditions of the assay, and no increase in fluorescence being observed. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls (Figure 3).


The development of a rapid SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR for detection of Duck circovirus.

Wan C, Huang Y, Cheng L, Fu G, Shi SH, Chen H, Peng C, Lin F, Lin J - Virol. J. (2011)

The specificity of the real-time PCR assay. Negative control including NTC (no template control), RA, E. coli, Duck Cholera, Avian influenza virus (H9 subtype), avian paramyxovirus (AMPV-1), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), Duck reovirus(DRV), Duck hepatitis A virus (DHV), the positive samples showed an identical melting curve profile. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3198713&req=5

Figure 3: The specificity of the real-time PCR assay. Negative control including NTC (no template control), RA, E. coli, Duck Cholera, Avian influenza virus (H9 subtype), avian paramyxovirus (AMPV-1), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), Duck reovirus(DRV), Duck hepatitis A virus (DHV), the positive samples showed an identical melting curve profile. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls.
Mentions: The specificity of the assay was examined with regard to the nucleic acids extracted from RA (Riemerella anatipestifer), E. coli (Escherichia coli), Duck Cholera (Pasteurella multocida), Avian influenza virus, avian paramyxovirus, Muscovy duck parvovirus, Duck reovirus, Duck hepatitis A virus, were run under the optimal conditions of the assay, and no increase in fluorescence being observed. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls (Figure 3).

Bottom Line: The established real time PCR was used to detect 45 DuCV-negative samples, which were tested using conventional PCR under the developed optimal conditions, each 15 for embryonated eggs, non-embryonated budgerigar eggs, newly hatched duck, the mixture of the lung, liver, spleen which were analysis for the presence of DuCV DNA, to conform that whether the DuCV can be transmitted vertically.Meanwhile, no positive result was shown by the real-time PCR method.The SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR can therefore be practically used as an alternative diagnostic tool and a screening method for ducks infected with duck circovirus.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China.

ABSTRACT
This report describes a one-step real-time polymerase chain reaction assay based on SYBR Green I for detection of a broad range of duck circovirus (DuCV). Align with all DuCV complete genome sequences and other Genus Circovirus download from the GenBank (such as goose circovirus, pigeon circovirus), the primers targets to the replicate gene of DuCV were designed. The detection assay was linear in the range of 1.31 × 102-1.31 × 107 copies/μL. The reaction efficiency of the assay using the slope (the slope was -3.349) and the Y-intercept was 37.01 from the linear equation was estimated to be 0.99 and the correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.993. A series of experiments were carried out to assess the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of the assay, following by the low intra-assay and inter-assay CVs for CT values obtained with the standard plasmids. The intra-assay CVs were equal or less than 1.89% and the inter-assay CVs were equal or less than 1.26%. There was no cross-reaction occurred with nucleic acids extracted from RA (Riemerella anatipestifer), E. coli (Escherichia coli), Duck Cholera (Pasteurella multocida), Avian influenza virus, avian paramyxovirus, Muscovy duck parvovirus, Duck reovirus, Duck hepatitis A virus as control templates. The nucleic acids extracted from samples of healthy ducks were used as negative controls. The assay was specific and reproducible. The established real time PCR was used to detect 45 DuCV-negative samples, which were tested using conventional PCR under the developed optimal conditions, each 15 for embryonated eggs, non-embryonated budgerigar eggs, newly hatched duck, the mixture of the lung, liver, spleen which were analysis for the presence of DuCV DNA, to conform that whether the DuCV can be transmitted vertically. Meanwhile, no positive result was shown by the real-time PCR method. The SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR can therefore be practically used as an alternative diagnostic tool and a screening method for ducks infected with duck circovirus.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus