Limits...
Recommendations for reviewing a manuscript for the GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung.

Schüttpelz-Brauns K, Stosch C, Matthes J, Himmelbauer M, Herrler A, Bachmann C, Huwendiek S, Huenges B, Kiessling C - GMS Z Med Ausbild (2010)

Bottom Line: The recommendations are based on the results of a workshop in 2007 and on a survey among reviewers of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild.The present recommendations shall help to increase the quality of the review process and to improve the national and international acceptance of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild.Additionally, transparency of the review processes will support authors to submit a scientific article of high quality.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dieter Scheffner Fachzentrum, Assessment-Bereich/Progress Test Medizin, Berlin, Deutschland.

ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper, written by the committee of educational research methodology of the "Society for Medical Education" of the German-speaking countries, will give recommendations for the review process of scientific papers in medical education. The recommendations are based on the results of a workshop in 2007 and on a survey among reviewers of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild. It reflects on international standards and research in medical education in Germany. The paper describes reviewer's function concerning the journal of GMS Z Med Ausbild and specifies criteria for the review process with regard to the editors and reviewers; it also gives proposals for a feedback to the author. The catalogue of criteria for the reviewers is pictured in a checklist. The present recommendations shall help to increase the quality of the review process and to improve the national and international acceptance of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild. Additionally, transparency of the review processes will support authors to submit a scientific article of high quality.

No MeSH data available.


Publications and refusals by the GMS Z Med Ausbild (2005 – 2009)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3140379&req=5

T1: Publications and refusals by the GMS Z Med Ausbild (2005 – 2009)

Mentions: Within in the past years, the number of original works submitted to the GMS Z Med Ausbild and the share of refused manuscripts increased continuously (see table 1 (Tab. 1)).


Recommendations for reviewing a manuscript for the GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung.

Schüttpelz-Brauns K, Stosch C, Matthes J, Himmelbauer M, Herrler A, Bachmann C, Huwendiek S, Huenges B, Kiessling C - GMS Z Med Ausbild (2010)

Publications and refusals by the GMS Z Med Ausbild (2005 – 2009)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3140379&req=5

T1: Publications and refusals by the GMS Z Med Ausbild (2005 – 2009)
Mentions: Within in the past years, the number of original works submitted to the GMS Z Med Ausbild and the share of refused manuscripts increased continuously (see table 1 (Tab. 1)).

Bottom Line: The recommendations are based on the results of a workshop in 2007 and on a survey among reviewers of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild.The present recommendations shall help to increase the quality of the review process and to improve the national and international acceptance of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild.Additionally, transparency of the review processes will support authors to submit a scientific article of high quality.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dieter Scheffner Fachzentrum, Assessment-Bereich/Progress Test Medizin, Berlin, Deutschland.

ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper, written by the committee of educational research methodology of the "Society for Medical Education" of the German-speaking countries, will give recommendations for the review process of scientific papers in medical education. The recommendations are based on the results of a workshop in 2007 and on a survey among reviewers of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild. It reflects on international standards and research in medical education in Germany. The paper describes reviewer's function concerning the journal of GMS Z Med Ausbild and specifies criteria for the review process with regard to the editors and reviewers; it also gives proposals for a feedback to the author. The catalogue of criteria for the reviewers is pictured in a checklist. The present recommendations shall help to increase the quality of the review process and to improve the national and international acceptance of the journal GMS Z Med Ausbild. Additionally, transparency of the review processes will support authors to submit a scientific article of high quality.

No MeSH data available.