Limits...
Direction of the oblique medial malleolar osteotomy for exposure of the talus.

van Bergen CJ, Tuijthof GJ, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN - Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2010)

Bottom Line: Using anteroposterior mortise radiographs and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans of 46 ankles (45 patients) with an osteochondral lesion of the talus, two observers independently measured the intersection angle between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus.The intraobserver (ICC, 0.90-0.93) and interobserver (ICC, 0.65-0.91) reliability of these measurements were good to excellent.A medial malleolar osteotomy directed at a mean 30° relative to the tibial axis enters the joint perpendicularly to the tibial cartilage, and will likely result in a congruent joint surface after reduction.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.j.vanbergen@amc.nl

ABSTRACT

Introduction: A medial malleolar osteotomy is often indicated for operative exposure of posteromedial osteochondral defects and fractures of the talus. To obtain a congruent joint surface after refixation, the oblique osteotomy should be directed perpendicularly to the articular surface of the tibia at the intersection between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus. The purpose of this study was to determine this perpendicular direction in relation to the longitudinal tibial axis for use during surgery.

Materials and methods: Using anteroposterior mortise radiographs and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans of 46 ankles (45 patients) with an osteochondral lesion of the talus, two observers independently measured the intersection angle between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus. The bisector of this angle indicated the osteotomy perpendicular to the tibial articular surface. This osteotomy was measured relative to the longitudinal tibial axis on radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess reliability.

Results: The mean osteotomy was 57.2 ± 3.2° relative to the tibial plafond on radiographs and 56.5 ± 2.8 on CT scans. This osteotomy corresponded to 30.4 ± 3.7° relative to the longitudinal tibial axis. The intraobserver (ICC, 0.90-0.93) and interobserver (ICC, 0.65-0.91) reliability of these measurements were good to excellent.

Conclusion: A medial malleolar osteotomy directed at a mean 30° relative to the tibial axis enters the joint perpendicularly to the tibial cartilage, and will likely result in a congruent joint surface after reduction.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Bland and Altman plot [25] showing the difference against mean for the osteotomy direction relative to the tibial plafond as measured on radiographs and CT-scans. The clinically acceptable difference between radiography and CT was defined at 5.0° (dashed lines). One measurement was outside this limit
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3117279&req=5

Fig8: Bland and Altman plot [25] showing the difference against mean for the osteotomy direction relative to the tibial plafond as measured on radiographs and CT-scans. The clinically acceptable difference between radiography and CT was defined at 5.0° (dashed lines). One measurement was outside this limit

Mentions: There was no statistically significant systematic difference between radiographic and computed tomographic measurements of the mean intersection (mean, 1.4°; 95% CI, −0.4–3.2) or the osteotomy (mean, 0.7°; 95% CI, −0.2–1.6) relative to the tibial plafond. The limits of agreement (i.e., mean ± 2SD of the difference between radiography and CT) of the osteotomy relative to the tibial plafond were −5.0–5.1°. In 45 of 46 ankles the difference was less than 5.0° (Fig. 8).Fig. 8


Direction of the oblique medial malleolar osteotomy for exposure of the talus.

van Bergen CJ, Tuijthof GJ, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN - Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2010)

Bland and Altman plot [25] showing the difference against mean for the osteotomy direction relative to the tibial plafond as measured on radiographs and CT-scans. The clinically acceptable difference between radiography and CT was defined at 5.0° (dashed lines). One measurement was outside this limit
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3117279&req=5

Fig8: Bland and Altman plot [25] showing the difference against mean for the osteotomy direction relative to the tibial plafond as measured on radiographs and CT-scans. The clinically acceptable difference between radiography and CT was defined at 5.0° (dashed lines). One measurement was outside this limit
Mentions: There was no statistically significant systematic difference between radiographic and computed tomographic measurements of the mean intersection (mean, 1.4°; 95% CI, −0.4–3.2) or the osteotomy (mean, 0.7°; 95% CI, −0.2–1.6) relative to the tibial plafond. The limits of agreement (i.e., mean ± 2SD of the difference between radiography and CT) of the osteotomy relative to the tibial plafond were −5.0–5.1°. In 45 of 46 ankles the difference was less than 5.0° (Fig. 8).Fig. 8

Bottom Line: Using anteroposterior mortise radiographs and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans of 46 ankles (45 patients) with an osteochondral lesion of the talus, two observers independently measured the intersection angle between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus.The intraobserver (ICC, 0.90-0.93) and interobserver (ICC, 0.65-0.91) reliability of these measurements were good to excellent.A medial malleolar osteotomy directed at a mean 30° relative to the tibial axis enters the joint perpendicularly to the tibial cartilage, and will likely result in a congruent joint surface after reduction.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.j.vanbergen@amc.nl

ABSTRACT

Introduction: A medial malleolar osteotomy is often indicated for operative exposure of posteromedial osteochondral defects and fractures of the talus. To obtain a congruent joint surface after refixation, the oblique osteotomy should be directed perpendicularly to the articular surface of the tibia at the intersection between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus. The purpose of this study was to determine this perpendicular direction in relation to the longitudinal tibial axis for use during surgery.

Materials and methods: Using anteroposterior mortise radiographs and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans of 46 ankles (45 patients) with an osteochondral lesion of the talus, two observers independently measured the intersection angle between the tibial plafond and medial malleolus. The bisector of this angle indicated the osteotomy perpendicular to the tibial articular surface. This osteotomy was measured relative to the longitudinal tibial axis on radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess reliability.

Results: The mean osteotomy was 57.2 ± 3.2° relative to the tibial plafond on radiographs and 56.5 ± 2.8 on CT scans. This osteotomy corresponded to 30.4 ± 3.7° relative to the longitudinal tibial axis. The intraobserver (ICC, 0.90-0.93) and interobserver (ICC, 0.65-0.91) reliability of these measurements were good to excellent.

Conclusion: A medial malleolar osteotomy directed at a mean 30° relative to the tibial axis enters the joint perpendicularly to the tibial cartilage, and will likely result in a congruent joint surface after reduction.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus