Limits...
The relationship between the error catastrophe, survival of the flattest, and natural selection.

Tejero H, Marín A, Montero F - BMC Evol. Biol. (2011)

Bottom Line: Previous works are explicitly reinterpreted in the light of the results obtained in this paper.The main conclusion of this paper is that the entry into error catastrophe is a specific case of survival of the flattest acting on phenotypes that differ in the trade-off between replicative ability and mutational robustness.So we propose to consider the transition to error catastrophe as a phenomenon of intra-quasispecies selection, and survival of the flattest as a phenomenon of inter-quasispecies selection.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avd, Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

ABSTRACT

Background: The quasispecies model is a general model of evolution that is generally applicable to replication up to high mutation rates. It predicts that at a sufficiently high mutation rate, quasispecies with higher mutational robustness can displace quasispecies with higher replicative capacity, a phenomenon called "survival of the flattest". In some fitness landscapes it also predicts the existence of a maximum mutation rate, called the error threshold, beyond which the quasispecies enters into error catastrophe, losing its genetic information. The aim of this paper is to study the relationship between survival of the flattest and the transition to error catastrophe, as well as the connection between these concepts and natural selection.

Results: By means of a very simplified model, we show that the transition to an error catastrophe corresponds to a value of zero for the selective coefficient of the mutant phenotype with respect to the master phenotype, indicating that transition to the error catastrophe is in this case similar to the selection of a more robust species. This correspondence has been confirmed by considering a single-peak landscape in which sequences are grouped with respect to their Hamming distant from the master sequence. When the robustness of a class is changed by modification of its quality factor, the distribution of the population changes in accordance with the new value of the robustness, although an error catastrophe can be detected at the same values as in the general case. When two quasispecies of different robustness competes with one another, the entry of one of them into error catastrophe causes displacement of the other, because of the greater robustness of the former. Previous works are explicitly reinterpreted in the light of the results obtained in this paper.

Conclusions: The main conclusion of this paper is that the entry into error catastrophe is a specific case of survival of the flattest acting on phenotypes that differ in the trade-off between replicative ability and mutational robustness. In fact, entry into error catastrophe occurs when the mutant phenotype acquires a selective advantage over the master phenotype. As both entry into error catastrophe and survival of the flattest are caused by natural selection when mutation rate is increased, we propose differentiating between them by the level of selection at which natural selection acts. So we propose to consider the transition to error catastrophe as a phenomenon of intra-quasispecies selection, and survival of the flattest as a phenomenon of inter-quasispecies selection.

Show MeSH
Hamming class fraction vs the selection coefficient (s). The amplification factors of the master sequence, i.e. the zero Hamming class, is Am = 10, and that of every other Hamming class Hi is Ai = 2. The degradation factor is the same for all the Hamming classes and is D = 1. The sequence length is ν = 20. The selection coefficient is evaluated following equation 6, that is to say considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3037306&req=5

Figure 2: Hamming class fraction vs the selection coefficient (s). The amplification factors of the master sequence, i.e. the zero Hamming class, is Am = 10, and that of every other Hamming class Hi is Ai = 2. The degradation factor is the same for all the Hamming classes and is D = 1. The sequence length is ν = 20. The selection coefficient is evaluated following equation 6, that is to say considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.

Mentions: Figure 2 shows that the transitions observed at the error threshold take place when the selection coefficient equals zero. This coefficient has been expressed in a similar way to that of the previous section, and evaluated considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.


The relationship between the error catastrophe, survival of the flattest, and natural selection.

Tejero H, Marín A, Montero F - BMC Evol. Biol. (2011)

Hamming class fraction vs the selection coefficient (s). The amplification factors of the master sequence, i.e. the zero Hamming class, is Am = 10, and that of every other Hamming class Hi is Ai = 2. The degradation factor is the same for all the Hamming classes and is D = 1. The sequence length is ν = 20. The selection coefficient is evaluated following equation 6, that is to say considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC3037306&req=5

Figure 2: Hamming class fraction vs the selection coefficient (s). The amplification factors of the master sequence, i.e. the zero Hamming class, is Am = 10, and that of every other Hamming class Hi is Ai = 2. The degradation factor is the same for all the Hamming classes and is D = 1. The sequence length is ν = 20. The selection coefficient is evaluated following equation 6, that is to say considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.
Mentions: Figure 2 shows that the transitions observed at the error threshold take place when the selection coefficient equals zero. This coefficient has been expressed in a similar way to that of the previous section, and evaluated considering the mutant phenotype as a whole, not taking into account that it is composed by Hamming classes.

Bottom Line: Previous works are explicitly reinterpreted in the light of the results obtained in this paper.The main conclusion of this paper is that the entry into error catastrophe is a specific case of survival of the flattest acting on phenotypes that differ in the trade-off between replicative ability and mutational robustness.So we propose to consider the transition to error catastrophe as a phenomenon of intra-quasispecies selection, and survival of the flattest as a phenomenon of inter-quasispecies selection.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avd, Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

ABSTRACT

Background: The quasispecies model is a general model of evolution that is generally applicable to replication up to high mutation rates. It predicts that at a sufficiently high mutation rate, quasispecies with higher mutational robustness can displace quasispecies with higher replicative capacity, a phenomenon called "survival of the flattest". In some fitness landscapes it also predicts the existence of a maximum mutation rate, called the error threshold, beyond which the quasispecies enters into error catastrophe, losing its genetic information. The aim of this paper is to study the relationship between survival of the flattest and the transition to error catastrophe, as well as the connection between these concepts and natural selection.

Results: By means of a very simplified model, we show that the transition to an error catastrophe corresponds to a value of zero for the selective coefficient of the mutant phenotype with respect to the master phenotype, indicating that transition to the error catastrophe is in this case similar to the selection of a more robust species. This correspondence has been confirmed by considering a single-peak landscape in which sequences are grouped with respect to their Hamming distant from the master sequence. When the robustness of a class is changed by modification of its quality factor, the distribution of the population changes in accordance with the new value of the robustness, although an error catastrophe can be detected at the same values as in the general case. When two quasispecies of different robustness competes with one another, the entry of one of them into error catastrophe causes displacement of the other, because of the greater robustness of the former. Previous works are explicitly reinterpreted in the light of the results obtained in this paper.

Conclusions: The main conclusion of this paper is that the entry into error catastrophe is a specific case of survival of the flattest acting on phenotypes that differ in the trade-off between replicative ability and mutational robustness. In fact, entry into error catastrophe occurs when the mutant phenotype acquires a selective advantage over the master phenotype. As both entry into error catastrophe and survival of the flattest are caused by natural selection when mutation rate is increased, we propose differentiating between them by the level of selection at which natural selection acts. So we propose to consider the transition to error catastrophe as a phenomenon of intra-quasispecies selection, and survival of the flattest as a phenomenon of inter-quasispecies selection.

Show MeSH