Limits...
Determining vitamin D status: a comparison between commercially available assays.

Snellman G, Melhus H, Gedeborg R, Byberg L, Berglund L, Wernroth L, Michaƫlsson K - PLoS ONE (2010)

Bottom Line: High inter-assay disagreement was found.The strongest correlation was found for HPLC-APCI-MS (r = 0.7), intermediate for RIA (r = 0.5) and lowest for CLIA (r = 0.4).The most valid method was HPLC-APCI-MS.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Section of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, [corrected] Uppsala, Sweden. greta.snellman@surgsci.uu.se

ABSTRACT

Background: Vitamin D is not only important for bone health but can also affect the development of several non-bone diseases. The definition of vitamin D insufficiency by serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D depends on the clinical outcome but might also be a consequence of analytical methods used for the definition. Although numerous 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays are available, their comparability is uncertain. We therefore aim to investigate the precision, accuracy and clinical consequences of differences in performance between three common commercially available assays.

Methodology/principal findings: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from 204 twins from the Swedish Twin Registry were determined with high-pressure liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-APCI-MS), a radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). High inter-assay disagreement was found. Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were highest for the HPLC-APCI-MS technique (85 nmol/L, 95% CI 81-89), intermediate for RIA (70 nmol/L, 95% CI 66-74) and lowest with CLIA (60 nmol/L, 95% CI 56-64). Using a 50-nmol/L cut-off, 8% of the subjects were insufficient using HPLC-APCI-MS, 22% with RIA and 43% by CLIA. Because of the heritable component of 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, the accuracy of each method could indirectly be assessed by comparison of within-twin pair correlations. The strongest correlation was found for HPLC-APCI-MS (r = 0.7), intermediate for RIA (r = 0.5) and lowest for CLIA (r = 0.4). Regression analyses between the methods revealed a non-uniform variance (p<0.0001) depending on level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Conclusions/significance: There are substantial inter-assay differences in performance. The most valid method was HPLC-APCI-MS. Calibration between 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays is intricate.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Cumulative proportion of the subjects who are classified as insufficient using a 50 nmol/L cut-off.HPLC-APCI-MS 8%, RIA 22%, CLIA 43%.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2903481&req=5

pone-0011555-g003: Cumulative proportion of the subjects who are classified as insufficient using a 50 nmol/L cut-off.HPLC-APCI-MS 8%, RIA 22%, CLIA 43%.

Mentions: There were considerable differences between the methods in the proportion of participants classified as vitamin D insufficient. Using a 50-nmol/L cut-off, only 8% of our subjects were classified as vitamin D insufficient with the HPLC-APCI-MS method, 22% using RIA and 43% with the CLIA method (Figure 3).


Determining vitamin D status: a comparison between commercially available assays.

Snellman G, Melhus H, Gedeborg R, Byberg L, Berglund L, Wernroth L, Michaƫlsson K - PLoS ONE (2010)

Cumulative proportion of the subjects who are classified as insufficient using a 50 nmol/L cut-off.HPLC-APCI-MS 8%, RIA 22%, CLIA 43%.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2903481&req=5

pone-0011555-g003: Cumulative proportion of the subjects who are classified as insufficient using a 50 nmol/L cut-off.HPLC-APCI-MS 8%, RIA 22%, CLIA 43%.
Mentions: There were considerable differences between the methods in the proportion of participants classified as vitamin D insufficient. Using a 50-nmol/L cut-off, only 8% of our subjects were classified as vitamin D insufficient with the HPLC-APCI-MS method, 22% using RIA and 43% with the CLIA method (Figure 3).

Bottom Line: High inter-assay disagreement was found.The strongest correlation was found for HPLC-APCI-MS (r = 0.7), intermediate for RIA (r = 0.5) and lowest for CLIA (r = 0.4).The most valid method was HPLC-APCI-MS.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Section of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, [corrected] Uppsala, Sweden. greta.snellman@surgsci.uu.se

ABSTRACT

Background: Vitamin D is not only important for bone health but can also affect the development of several non-bone diseases. The definition of vitamin D insufficiency by serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D depends on the clinical outcome but might also be a consequence of analytical methods used for the definition. Although numerous 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays are available, their comparability is uncertain. We therefore aim to investigate the precision, accuracy and clinical consequences of differences in performance between three common commercially available assays.

Methodology/principal findings: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from 204 twins from the Swedish Twin Registry were determined with high-pressure liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-APCI-MS), a radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). High inter-assay disagreement was found. Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were highest for the HPLC-APCI-MS technique (85 nmol/L, 95% CI 81-89), intermediate for RIA (70 nmol/L, 95% CI 66-74) and lowest with CLIA (60 nmol/L, 95% CI 56-64). Using a 50-nmol/L cut-off, 8% of the subjects were insufficient using HPLC-APCI-MS, 22% with RIA and 43% by CLIA. Because of the heritable component of 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, the accuracy of each method could indirectly be assessed by comparison of within-twin pair correlations. The strongest correlation was found for HPLC-APCI-MS (r = 0.7), intermediate for RIA (r = 0.5) and lowest for CLIA (r = 0.4). Regression analyses between the methods revealed a non-uniform variance (p<0.0001) depending on level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Conclusions/significance: There are substantial inter-assay differences in performance. The most valid method was HPLC-APCI-MS. Calibration between 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays is intricate.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus