Limits...
Variable classifications of glycemic index determined by glucose meters.

Lin MH, Wu MC, Lin J - J Clin Biochem Nutr (2010)

Bottom Line: The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 +/- 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 +/- 1.2, BGM, 117.4 +/- 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 +/- 1.3 mg/dl respectively.The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA.The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Food Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, 1, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.

ABSTRACT
THE STUDY EVALUATED AND COMPARED THE DIFFERENCES OF GLUCOSE RESPONSES, INCREMENTAL AREA UNDER CURVE (IAUC), GLYCEMIC INDEX (GI) AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF GI VALUES BETWEEN MEASURED BY BIOCHEMICAL ANALYZER (FUJI AUTOMATIC BIOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER (FAA)) AND THREE GLUCOSE METERS: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 +/- 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 +/- 1.2, BGM, 117.4 +/- 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 +/- 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 +/- 208 mg x min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 +/- 270 mg x min/dl), BGM (3730 +/- 241 mg x min/dl) and AGM (3394 +/- 253 mg x min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 +/- 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 +/- 1, 68 +/- 4 and 63 +/- 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use.

No MeSH data available.


Incremental changes in plasma glucose concentrations in brown rice, Chin-Hawn Mango, yogurt drink and white bread elicited by FAA, AGM, BGM and OGM. Closed circle, fuji automatic analyzer, (FAA); open circle, advantage glucose meter (AGM); open triangle, breeze 2 glucose meter (BGM); cross, optimum xceed glucose meter (OGM).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2901763&req=5

Figure 1: Incremental changes in plasma glucose concentrations in brown rice, Chin-Hawn Mango, yogurt drink and white bread elicited by FAA, AGM, BGM and OGM. Closed circle, fuji automatic analyzer, (FAA); open circle, advantage glucose meter (AGM); open triangle, breeze 2 glucose meter (BGM); cross, optimum xceed glucose meter (OGM).

Mentions: The study protocol was well tolerated. All 10 subjects completed the study. The glucose responses elicited by three test foods and reference white bread, measured by four different methods (FAA, OGM, BGM and AGM) are shown in Fig. 1. Mean glucose concentration measured by AGM tends to have a lowest responses curve in every time point in all test foods whereas OGM showed highest response curve among four methods.


Variable classifications of glycemic index determined by glucose meters.

Lin MH, Wu MC, Lin J - J Clin Biochem Nutr (2010)

Incremental changes in plasma glucose concentrations in brown rice, Chin-Hawn Mango, yogurt drink and white bread elicited by FAA, AGM, BGM and OGM. Closed circle, fuji automatic analyzer, (FAA); open circle, advantage glucose meter (AGM); open triangle, breeze 2 glucose meter (BGM); cross, optimum xceed glucose meter (OGM).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2901763&req=5

Figure 1: Incremental changes in plasma glucose concentrations in brown rice, Chin-Hawn Mango, yogurt drink and white bread elicited by FAA, AGM, BGM and OGM. Closed circle, fuji automatic analyzer, (FAA); open circle, advantage glucose meter (AGM); open triangle, breeze 2 glucose meter (BGM); cross, optimum xceed glucose meter (OGM).
Mentions: The study protocol was well tolerated. All 10 subjects completed the study. The glucose responses elicited by three test foods and reference white bread, measured by four different methods (FAA, OGM, BGM and AGM) are shown in Fig. 1. Mean glucose concentration measured by AGM tends to have a lowest responses curve in every time point in all test foods whereas OGM showed highest response curve among four methods.

Bottom Line: The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 +/- 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 +/- 1.2, BGM, 117.4 +/- 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 +/- 1.3 mg/dl respectively.The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA.The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Food Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, 1, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.

ABSTRACT
THE STUDY EVALUATED AND COMPARED THE DIFFERENCES OF GLUCOSE RESPONSES, INCREMENTAL AREA UNDER CURVE (IAUC), GLYCEMIC INDEX (GI) AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF GI VALUES BETWEEN MEASURED BY BIOCHEMICAL ANALYZER (FUJI AUTOMATIC BIOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER (FAA)) AND THREE GLUCOSE METERS: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 +/- 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 +/- 1.2, BGM, 117.4 +/- 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 +/- 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 +/- 208 mg x min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 +/- 270 mg x min/dl), BGM (3730 +/- 241 mg x min/dl) and AGM (3394 +/- 253 mg x min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 +/- 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 +/- 1, 68 +/- 4 and 63 +/- 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use.

No MeSH data available.