Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter.

Sariali E, Lazennec JY, Khiami F, Catonné Y - Acta Orthop (2009)

Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2823207&req=5

Figure 0006: Combined influence of head offset and diameter on the jumping distance. 45° abduction and 15° anteversion cup angles are used.
Mentions: The jumping distance increased as the femoral head diameter increased (Figure 6). However, this gain became substantially reduced as the abduction angle increased; in fact, the gain in JD for each mm increase in head diameter was about 0.5 mm/ mm for 30° abduction angle, 0.4 mm/mm for 45° abduction angle, and 0.25 mm/mm for 60° abduction angle. The gain in JD was therefore minimal for high abduction angles.

Bottom Line: The jumping distance was found to decrease as the cup abduction angle increased (0.25 mm each 1 degree for 32-mm head diameter).The JD decreased by 0.92 mm for each 1-mm increase in head offset, showing that head offset was the most important parameter influencing the JD.An increase in offset of the femoral head substantially reduces the jumping distance and it should therefore be avoided.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France. hedisari@yahoo.fr

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose: The jumping distance (JD) is the degree of lateral translation of the femoral head center required before dislocation occurs. The smaller the distance, the higher the theoretical risk of dislocation. The aim of our study was to evaluate this jumping distance and its variation according to the characteristics of the implant, and also the theoretical gain in using large head diameters of above 38 mm.

Methods: The JD was calculated as a function of the cup anteversion and abduction angles, the head diameter, and the head offset (defined as the distance between the center of the femoral head and the cup opening plane). Head diameters of 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 mm were analyzed. The abduction angle was increased from 0 degrees to 80 degrees with a 10 degree increment. The anteversion angle was increased from 0 degrees to 40 degrees with a 5 degree increment.

Results: The jumping distance was found to decrease as the cup abduction angle increased (0.25 mm each 1 degree for 32-mm head diameter). It increased by 0.05 mm for a 1 degree increase in the anteversion angle. The jumping distance increased as the head diameter increased (0.4 mm each mm diameter for a 45 degree abduction angle). The net gain obtained by increasing the diameter, however, decreased when abduction angle increased (0.25 each mm diameter for 60 degree abduction). The JD decreased by 0.92 mm for each 1-mm increase in head offset, showing that head offset was the most important parameter influencing the JD.

Interpretation: The theoretical gain in stability obtained by using a large femoral head (above 36 mm) is negligible in cases where there is a high cup abduction angle. An increase in offset of the femoral head substantially reduces the jumping distance and it should therefore be avoided.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus