Limits...
What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?

Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J, Bolvig L, Jacobsen S, Søballe K - Acta Orthop (2009)

Bottom Line: The impingement test had the best diagnostic ability of the clinical tests, with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 100%.The positive predictive value was 100% while the negative predictive value was 13%.The impingement test is helpful in identifying acetabular labral tears.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. a_troelsen@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose: An acetabular labral tear is a diagnostic challenge. Various clinical tests have been described, but little is known about their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the diagnostic validity of clinical tests and ultrasound as compared with MR arthrography.

Patients and methods: We examined 18 patients (18 hips, 2 men, median age 43 (32-56) years) with impingement test, FABER test, resisted straight leg raise test, ultrasound, and MR arthrography. They had had previous periacetabular osteotomies due to symptomatic, acetabular dysplasia. All hips showed no or only slight signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0-1).

Results: MR arthrography identified labral tears in 17 of the 18 hips. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 94%, and was false negative in only 1 case compared to MR arthrography. The impingement test had the best diagnostic ability of the clinical tests, with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% while the negative predictive value was 13%.

Interpretation: The impingement test is helpful in identifying acetabular labral tears. If this test is negative and if a labral tear is still suspected, ultrasound can reliably diagnose most tears of the acetabular labrum. MR arthrography is indicated in cases where ultrasound is negative, but the patient suffers continued, specific symptoms.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

An acetabular labral tear visualized by MR arthrography (coronal view) with contrast medium running through the base of the labrum.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2823204&req=5

Figure 0004: An acetabular labral tear visualized by MR arthrography (coronal view) with contrast medium running through the base of the labrum.

Mentions: Acetabular labral tears were identified in 17 of the 18 hip joints on MR arthrograms (Figure 4). The agreement observed between blinded re-readings of MR arthrograms was 100%.


What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?

Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J, Bolvig L, Jacobsen S, Søballe K - Acta Orthop (2009)

An acetabular labral tear visualized by MR arthrography (coronal view) with contrast medium running through the base of the labrum.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2823204&req=5

Figure 0004: An acetabular labral tear visualized by MR arthrography (coronal view) with contrast medium running through the base of the labrum.
Mentions: Acetabular labral tears were identified in 17 of the 18 hip joints on MR arthrograms (Figure 4). The agreement observed between blinded re-readings of MR arthrograms was 100%.

Bottom Line: The impingement test had the best diagnostic ability of the clinical tests, with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 100%.The positive predictive value was 100% while the negative predictive value was 13%.The impingement test is helpful in identifying acetabular labral tears.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. a_troelsen@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose: An acetabular labral tear is a diagnostic challenge. Various clinical tests have been described, but little is known about their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the diagnostic validity of clinical tests and ultrasound as compared with MR arthrography.

Patients and methods: We examined 18 patients (18 hips, 2 men, median age 43 (32-56) years) with impingement test, FABER test, resisted straight leg raise test, ultrasound, and MR arthrography. They had had previous periacetabular osteotomies due to symptomatic, acetabular dysplasia. All hips showed no or only slight signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0-1).

Results: MR arthrography identified labral tears in 17 of the 18 hips. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 94%, and was false negative in only 1 case compared to MR arthrography. The impingement test had the best diagnostic ability of the clinical tests, with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% while the negative predictive value was 13%.

Interpretation: The impingement test is helpful in identifying acetabular labral tears. If this test is negative and if a labral tear is still suspected, ultrasound can reliably diagnose most tears of the acetabular labrum. MR arthrography is indicated in cases where ultrasound is negative, but the patient suffers continued, specific symptoms.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus