Limits...
Microbial communication, cooperation and cheating: quorum sensing drives the evolution of cooperation in bacteria.

Czárán T, Hoekstra RF - PLoS ONE (2009)

Bottom Line: Bacterial cooperation may take the form of the excretion of "public goods": exoproducts such as virulence factors, exoenzymes or components of the matrix in biofilms, to yield significant benefit for individuals joining in the common effort of producing them.The cooperative population is exposed to exploitation by cheaters, i.e., mutants who contribute less or nil to the effort but fully enjoy the benefits of cooperation.Since there is no reason to assume that such cheaters cannot evolve and invade the populations of honestly signaling cooperators, the empirical fact of the existence of both bacterial cooperation and the associated QS communication system seems puzzling.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Ecology and Theoretical Biology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Science and Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary. czaran@ludens.elte.hu

ABSTRACT
An increasing body of empirical evidence suggests that cooperation among clone-mates is common in bacteria. Bacterial cooperation may take the form of the excretion of "public goods": exoproducts such as virulence factors, exoenzymes or components of the matrix in biofilms, to yield significant benefit for individuals joining in the common effort of producing them. Supposedly in order to spare unnecessary costs when the population is too sparse to supply the sufficient exoproduct level, many bacteria have evolved a simple chemical communication system called quorum sensing (QS), to "measure" the population density of clone-mates in their close neighborhood. Cooperation genes are expressed only above a threshold rate of QS signal molecule re-capture, i.e., above the local quorum of cooperators. The cooperative population is exposed to exploitation by cheaters, i.e., mutants who contribute less or nil to the effort but fully enjoy the benefits of cooperation. The communication system is also vulnerable to a different type of cheaters ("Liars") who may produce the QS signal but not the exoproduct, thus ruining the reliability of the signal. Since there is no reason to assume that such cheaters cannot evolve and invade the populations of honestly signaling cooperators, the empirical fact of the existence of both bacterial cooperation and the associated QS communication system seems puzzling. Using a stochastic cellular automaton approach and allowing mutations in an initially non-cooperating, non-communicating strain we show that both cooperation and the associated communication system can evolve, spread and remain persistent. The QS genes help cooperative behavior to invade the population, and vice versa; cooperation and communication might have evolved synergistically in bacteria. Moreover, in good agreement with the empirical data recently available, this synergism opens up a remarkably rich repertoire of social interactions in which cheating and exploitation are commonplace.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Stationary genotype distributions of the QS-disabled set of simulations.All parameters as in Fig. 1. except μs = μr = 10−4.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2722019&req=5

pone-0006655-g003: Stationary genotype distributions of the QS-disabled set of simulations.All parameters as in Fig. 1. except μs = μr = 10−4.

Mentions: Keeping the costs mC, mS, mR and the cooperation reward r constant, we have systematically screened the effects of the quorum threshold nq and the diffusion parameter D on the evolution of cooperation and quorum sensing (Fig. 3, left column). Comparison with the corresponding cases without the possibility of QS (Fig. 1, left column) immediately shows that the QS functions of signalling and responding are selected in a large part of the parameter space and that they have a positive effect on the relative frequency of cooperation in the population.


Microbial communication, cooperation and cheating: quorum sensing drives the evolution of cooperation in bacteria.

Czárán T, Hoekstra RF - PLoS ONE (2009)

Stationary genotype distributions of the QS-disabled set of simulations.All parameters as in Fig. 1. except μs = μr = 10−4.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2722019&req=5

pone-0006655-g003: Stationary genotype distributions of the QS-disabled set of simulations.All parameters as in Fig. 1. except μs = μr = 10−4.
Mentions: Keeping the costs mC, mS, mR and the cooperation reward r constant, we have systematically screened the effects of the quorum threshold nq and the diffusion parameter D on the evolution of cooperation and quorum sensing (Fig. 3, left column). Comparison with the corresponding cases without the possibility of QS (Fig. 1, left column) immediately shows that the QS functions of signalling and responding are selected in a large part of the parameter space and that they have a positive effect on the relative frequency of cooperation in the population.

Bottom Line: Bacterial cooperation may take the form of the excretion of "public goods": exoproducts such as virulence factors, exoenzymes or components of the matrix in biofilms, to yield significant benefit for individuals joining in the common effort of producing them.The cooperative population is exposed to exploitation by cheaters, i.e., mutants who contribute less or nil to the effort but fully enjoy the benefits of cooperation.Since there is no reason to assume that such cheaters cannot evolve and invade the populations of honestly signaling cooperators, the empirical fact of the existence of both bacterial cooperation and the associated QS communication system seems puzzling.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Ecology and Theoretical Biology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Science and Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary. czaran@ludens.elte.hu

ABSTRACT
An increasing body of empirical evidence suggests that cooperation among clone-mates is common in bacteria. Bacterial cooperation may take the form of the excretion of "public goods": exoproducts such as virulence factors, exoenzymes or components of the matrix in biofilms, to yield significant benefit for individuals joining in the common effort of producing them. Supposedly in order to spare unnecessary costs when the population is too sparse to supply the sufficient exoproduct level, many bacteria have evolved a simple chemical communication system called quorum sensing (QS), to "measure" the population density of clone-mates in their close neighborhood. Cooperation genes are expressed only above a threshold rate of QS signal molecule re-capture, i.e., above the local quorum of cooperators. The cooperative population is exposed to exploitation by cheaters, i.e., mutants who contribute less or nil to the effort but fully enjoy the benefits of cooperation. The communication system is also vulnerable to a different type of cheaters ("Liars") who may produce the QS signal but not the exoproduct, thus ruining the reliability of the signal. Since there is no reason to assume that such cheaters cannot evolve and invade the populations of honestly signaling cooperators, the empirical fact of the existence of both bacterial cooperation and the associated QS communication system seems puzzling. Using a stochastic cellular automaton approach and allowing mutations in an initially non-cooperating, non-communicating strain we show that both cooperation and the associated communication system can evolve, spread and remain persistent. The QS genes help cooperative behavior to invade the population, and vice versa; cooperation and communication might have evolved synergistically in bacteria. Moreover, in good agreement with the empirical data recently available, this synergism opens up a remarkably rich repertoire of social interactions in which cheating and exploitation are commonplace.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus