Limits...
Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study.

Sandqvist G, Johnsson PM, Sturesson AL, Tägil M, Geborek P - BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2009)

Bottom Line: All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points.Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points.However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. gunnel.sandqvist@skane.se

ABSTRACT

Background: Rheumatic diseases commonly affect joints and other structures in the hand. Surgery is a traditional way to treat hand problems in inflammatory rheumatic diseases with the purposes of pain relief, restore function and prevent progression. There are numerous measures to choose from, and a combination of outcome measures is recommended. This study evaluated if instruments commonly used in rheumatologic clinical practice are suitable to measure outcome of hand surgery and to identify time points relevant for follow-up.

Methods: Thirty-one patients (median age 56 years, median disease duration 15 years) with inflammatory rheumatic disease and need for post-surgical occupational therapy intervention formed this pilot study group. Hand function was assessed regarding grip strength (Grippit), pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM) (Signals of Functional Impairment (SOFI)) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test (GAT)). Activities of daily life (ADL) were assessed by means of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome (DASH) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The instruments were evaluated by responsiveness and feasibility; follow-up points were 0, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results: All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points. Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points. The responsiveness of the instruments was stable between 6 and 12 month follow-up which imply that 6 month is an appropriate time for evaluating short-term effect of hand surgery in rheumatic diseases.

Conclusion: We suggest a core set of instruments measuring pain, grip strength, grip ability, perceived symptoms and self-defined daily activities. This study has shown that VAS pain, the Grippit instrument, GAT, DASH symptom scale and COPM are suitable outcome instruments for hand surgery, while SOFI may be a more insensitive test. However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

SMR for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 month.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2691396&req=5

Figure 1: SMR for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 month.

Mentions: Responsiveness for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 months are illustrated in figure 1. Overall COPM satisfaction showed the best responsiveness, with SMR consistently above 0.8, but also COPM performance had SMR between moderate and large. SOFI had low responsiveness at all follow-up time points with SMR between small (0.2) and moderate (0.5). The Grippit instrument obtained a very low responsiveness at the 3-month follow-up, but this improved considerably at the 12-month follow-up. Moreover, a higher SMR at the 12-month follow-up time point was a common feature for most of the instruments.


Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study.

Sandqvist G, Johnsson PM, Sturesson AL, Tägil M, Geborek P - BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2009)

SMR for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 month.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2691396&req=5

Figure 1: SMR for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 month.
Mentions: Responsiveness for the different instruments at follow up 3, 6, and 12 months are illustrated in figure 1. Overall COPM satisfaction showed the best responsiveness, with SMR consistently above 0.8, but also COPM performance had SMR between moderate and large. SOFI had low responsiveness at all follow-up time points with SMR between small (0.2) and moderate (0.5). The Grippit instrument obtained a very low responsiveness at the 3-month follow-up, but this improved considerably at the 12-month follow-up. Moreover, a higher SMR at the 12-month follow-up time point was a common feature for most of the instruments.

Bottom Line: All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points.Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points.However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. gunnel.sandqvist@skane.se

ABSTRACT

Background: Rheumatic diseases commonly affect joints and other structures in the hand. Surgery is a traditional way to treat hand problems in inflammatory rheumatic diseases with the purposes of pain relief, restore function and prevent progression. There are numerous measures to choose from, and a combination of outcome measures is recommended. This study evaluated if instruments commonly used in rheumatologic clinical practice are suitable to measure outcome of hand surgery and to identify time points relevant for follow-up.

Methods: Thirty-one patients (median age 56 years, median disease duration 15 years) with inflammatory rheumatic disease and need for post-surgical occupational therapy intervention formed this pilot study group. Hand function was assessed regarding grip strength (Grippit), pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM) (Signals of Functional Impairment (SOFI)) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test (GAT)). Activities of daily life (ADL) were assessed by means of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome (DASH) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The instruments were evaluated by responsiveness and feasibility; follow-up points were 0, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results: All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points. Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points. The responsiveness of the instruments was stable between 6 and 12 month follow-up which imply that 6 month is an appropriate time for evaluating short-term effect of hand surgery in rheumatic diseases.

Conclusion: We suggest a core set of instruments measuring pain, grip strength, grip ability, perceived symptoms and self-defined daily activities. This study has shown that VAS pain, the Grippit instrument, GAT, DASH symptom scale and COPM are suitable outcome instruments for hand surgery, while SOFI may be a more insensitive test. However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus