Limits...
The coevolution of cooperation and dispersal in social groups and its implications for the emergence of multicellularity.

Hochberg ME, Rankin DJ, Taborsky M - BMC Evol. Biol. (2008)

Bottom Line: In addition to the necessity of reducing conflict over effecting specialized tasks, differentiating groups must control the exploitation of the commons, or else be out-competed by more fit groups.The propensity for cheaters to disperse is highest with intermediate benefit:cost ratios of cooperative acts and with high relatedness.We suggest that trait linkage between dispersal and cheating should be operative regardless of whether groups ever achieve higher levels of individuality, because individual selection will always tend to increase exploitation, and stronger group structure will tend to increase overall cooperation through kin selected benefits.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5554, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France. mhochber@univ-montp2.fr

ABSTRACT

Background: Recent work on the complexity of life highlights the roles played by evolutionary forces at different levels of individuality. One of the central puzzles in explaining transitions in individuality for entities ranging from complex cells, to multicellular organisms and societies, is how different autonomous units relinquish control over their functions to others in the group. In addition to the necessity of reducing conflict over effecting specialized tasks, differentiating groups must control the exploitation of the commons, or else be out-competed by more fit groups.

Results: We propose that two forms of conflict - access to resources within groups and representation in germ line - may be resolved in tandem through individual and group-level selective effects. Specifically, we employ an optimization model to show the conditions under which different within-group social behaviors (cooperators producing a public good or cheaters exploiting the public good) may be selected to disperse, thereby not affecting the commons and functioning as germ line. We find that partial or complete dispersal specialization of cheaters is a general outcome. The propensity for cheaters to disperse is highest with intermediate benefit:cost ratios of cooperative acts and with high relatedness. An examination of a range of real biological systems tends to support our theory, although additional study is required to provide robust tests.

Conclusion: We suggest that trait linkage between dispersal and cheating should be operative regardless of whether groups ever achieve higher levels of individuality, because individual selection will always tend to increase exploitation, and stronger group structure will tend to increase overall cooperation through kin selected benefits. Cheater specialization as dispersers offers simultaneous solutions to the evolution of cooperation in social groups and the origin of specialization of germ and soma in multicellular organisms.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Overall cooperation, Φ = n *(1 - y*)+(1-n*)z*, associated with simulations in Figure 4.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2533331&req=5

Figure 6: Overall cooperation, Φ = n *(1 - y*)+(1-n*)z*, associated with simulations in Figure 4.

Mentions: If we define the functional role of a cooperator as contributing to the public good, and that well functioning groups minimize the impact of cheats on the public good, then, trivially, specialization resulting in mobile cooperators and sedentary cheaters corresponds to a non-social, individualistic scenario, and cannot be considered a group related phenomenon. There are however two ways in which the impact of cheaters on the commons can be reduced: either 1-n* decreases and/or z* increases. Figure 6 presents the effects of model processes on overall cooperation, defined as Φ = n* (1-y*) + (1-n*) z*. We see that although high levels of Φ are generally promoted for high P:s ratios, perfect overall cooperation (Φ = 1) is most readily obtained at low k and intermediate P:s ratios (e.g. Fig. 6c).


The coevolution of cooperation and dispersal in social groups and its implications for the emergence of multicellularity.

Hochberg ME, Rankin DJ, Taborsky M - BMC Evol. Biol. (2008)

Overall cooperation, Φ = n *(1 - y*)+(1-n*)z*, associated with simulations in Figure 4.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2533331&req=5

Figure 6: Overall cooperation, Φ = n *(1 - y*)+(1-n*)z*, associated with simulations in Figure 4.
Mentions: If we define the functional role of a cooperator as contributing to the public good, and that well functioning groups minimize the impact of cheats on the public good, then, trivially, specialization resulting in mobile cooperators and sedentary cheaters corresponds to a non-social, individualistic scenario, and cannot be considered a group related phenomenon. There are however two ways in which the impact of cheaters on the commons can be reduced: either 1-n* decreases and/or z* increases. Figure 6 presents the effects of model processes on overall cooperation, defined as Φ = n* (1-y*) + (1-n*) z*. We see that although high levels of Φ are generally promoted for high P:s ratios, perfect overall cooperation (Φ = 1) is most readily obtained at low k and intermediate P:s ratios (e.g. Fig. 6c).

Bottom Line: In addition to the necessity of reducing conflict over effecting specialized tasks, differentiating groups must control the exploitation of the commons, or else be out-competed by more fit groups.The propensity for cheaters to disperse is highest with intermediate benefit:cost ratios of cooperative acts and with high relatedness.We suggest that trait linkage between dispersal and cheating should be operative regardless of whether groups ever achieve higher levels of individuality, because individual selection will always tend to increase exploitation, and stronger group structure will tend to increase overall cooperation through kin selected benefits.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5554, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France. mhochber@univ-montp2.fr

ABSTRACT

Background: Recent work on the complexity of life highlights the roles played by evolutionary forces at different levels of individuality. One of the central puzzles in explaining transitions in individuality for entities ranging from complex cells, to multicellular organisms and societies, is how different autonomous units relinquish control over their functions to others in the group. In addition to the necessity of reducing conflict over effecting specialized tasks, differentiating groups must control the exploitation of the commons, or else be out-competed by more fit groups.

Results: We propose that two forms of conflict - access to resources within groups and representation in germ line - may be resolved in tandem through individual and group-level selective effects. Specifically, we employ an optimization model to show the conditions under which different within-group social behaviors (cooperators producing a public good or cheaters exploiting the public good) may be selected to disperse, thereby not affecting the commons and functioning as germ line. We find that partial or complete dispersal specialization of cheaters is a general outcome. The propensity for cheaters to disperse is highest with intermediate benefit:cost ratios of cooperative acts and with high relatedness. An examination of a range of real biological systems tends to support our theory, although additional study is required to provide robust tests.

Conclusion: We suggest that trait linkage between dispersal and cheating should be operative regardless of whether groups ever achieve higher levels of individuality, because individual selection will always tend to increase exploitation, and stronger group structure will tend to increase overall cooperation through kin selected benefits. Cheater specialization as dispersers offers simultaneous solutions to the evolution of cooperation in social groups and the origin of specialization of germ and soma in multicellular organisms.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus