Limits...
Point-of-care platelet function assays demonstrate reduced responsiveness to clopidogrel, but not aspirin, in patients with Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy.

Hobson AR, Petley G, Morton G, Dawkins KD, Curzen NP - Thromb J (2008)

Bottom Line: There were no differences in responses to aspirin.There was significantly greater platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in the ST group using the Accumetrics P2Y12 assay (183 +/- 51 vs. 108 +/- 31, p = 0.02) and a trend towards greater reactivity using TEG AUC15 (910 +/- 328 vs. 618 +/- 129, p = 0.07). 57% of the ST group by TEG and 43% of the ST cases by Accumetrics PRU had results > two standard deviations above the expected mean in the control group.The availability of point-of-care assays that can detect these responses raises the possibility of prospectively identifying DES patients at risk of ST and manipulating their subsequent risk.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Wessex Cardiac Unit, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK. nick.curzen@suht.swest.nhs.uk.

ABSTRACT

Background: To test the hypothesis that point-of-care assays of platelet reactivity would demonstrate reduced response to antiplatelet therapy in patients who experienced Drug Eluting Stent (DES) ST whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy compared to matched DES controls. Whilst the aetiology of stent thrombosis (ST) is multifactorial there is increasing evidence from laboratory-based assays that hyporesponsiveness to antiplatelet therapy is a factor in some cases.

Methods: From 3004 PCI patients, seven survivors of DES ST whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy were identified and each matched with two patients without ST. Analysis was performed using (a) short Thrombelastogram PlateletMappingtrade mark (TEG) and (b) VerifyNow Aspirin and P2Y12 assays. TEG analysis was performed using the Area Under the Curve at 15 minutes (AUC15) as previously described.

Results: There were no differences in responses to aspirin. There was significantly greater platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in the ST group using the Accumetrics P2Y12 assay (183 +/- 51 vs. 108 +/- 31, p = 0.02) and a trend towards greater reactivity using TEG AUC15 (910 +/- 328 vs. 618 +/- 129, p = 0.07). 57% of the ST group by TEG and 43% of the ST cases by Accumetrics PRU had results > two standard deviations above the expected mean in the control group.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates reduced platelet response to clopidogrel in some patients with DES ST compared to matched controls. The availability of point-of-care assays that can detect these responses raises the possibility of prospectively identifying DES patients at risk of ST and manipulating their subsequent risk.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Accumetrics Results. VerifyNow PRU in the ST group and in matched controls. Mean PRU was significantly higher in the ST group than in matched controls ((183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02)). The five greatest responses (signifying the least response to clopidogrel) all occurred in the ST group. {PRU – Platelet Reaction Units; ST – Stent Thrombosis}.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2268678&req=5

Figure 2: Accumetrics Results. VerifyNow PRU in the ST group and in matched controls. Mean PRU was significantly higher in the ST group than in matched controls ((183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02)). The five greatest responses (signifying the least response to clopidogrel) all occurred in the ST group. {PRU – Platelet Reaction Units; ST – Stent Thrombosis}.

Mentions: The PRU in the ST group was significantly higher than in controls (183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02). 43% (3 of 7) of the ST cases compared to 0% of controls had PRU > 225 (PRU > 2 standard deviations above the mean of the control group) (See Figure 2).


Point-of-care platelet function assays demonstrate reduced responsiveness to clopidogrel, but not aspirin, in patients with Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy.

Hobson AR, Petley G, Morton G, Dawkins KD, Curzen NP - Thromb J (2008)

Accumetrics Results. VerifyNow PRU in the ST group and in matched controls. Mean PRU was significantly higher in the ST group than in matched controls ((183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02)). The five greatest responses (signifying the least response to clopidogrel) all occurred in the ST group. {PRU – Platelet Reaction Units; ST – Stent Thrombosis}.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC2268678&req=5

Figure 2: Accumetrics Results. VerifyNow PRU in the ST group and in matched controls. Mean PRU was significantly higher in the ST group than in matched controls ((183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02)). The five greatest responses (signifying the least response to clopidogrel) all occurred in the ST group. {PRU – Platelet Reaction Units; ST – Stent Thrombosis}.
Mentions: The PRU in the ST group was significantly higher than in controls (183 ± 51 vs. 108 ± 31, p = 0.02). 43% (3 of 7) of the ST cases compared to 0% of controls had PRU > 225 (PRU > 2 standard deviations above the mean of the control group) (See Figure 2).

Bottom Line: There were no differences in responses to aspirin.There was significantly greater platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in the ST group using the Accumetrics P2Y12 assay (183 +/- 51 vs. 108 +/- 31, p = 0.02) and a trend towards greater reactivity using TEG AUC15 (910 +/- 328 vs. 618 +/- 129, p = 0.07). 57% of the ST group by TEG and 43% of the ST cases by Accumetrics PRU had results > two standard deviations above the expected mean in the control group.The availability of point-of-care assays that can detect these responses raises the possibility of prospectively identifying DES patients at risk of ST and manipulating their subsequent risk.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Wessex Cardiac Unit, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK. nick.curzen@suht.swest.nhs.uk.

ABSTRACT

Background: To test the hypothesis that point-of-care assays of platelet reactivity would demonstrate reduced response to antiplatelet therapy in patients who experienced Drug Eluting Stent (DES) ST whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy compared to matched DES controls. Whilst the aetiology of stent thrombosis (ST) is multifactorial there is increasing evidence from laboratory-based assays that hyporesponsiveness to antiplatelet therapy is a factor in some cases.

Methods: From 3004 PCI patients, seven survivors of DES ST whilst on dual antiplatelet therapy were identified and each matched with two patients without ST. Analysis was performed using (a) short Thrombelastogram PlateletMappingtrade mark (TEG) and (b) VerifyNow Aspirin and P2Y12 assays. TEG analysis was performed using the Area Under the Curve at 15 minutes (AUC15) as previously described.

Results: There were no differences in responses to aspirin. There was significantly greater platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in the ST group using the Accumetrics P2Y12 assay (183 +/- 51 vs. 108 +/- 31, p = 0.02) and a trend towards greater reactivity using TEG AUC15 (910 +/- 328 vs. 618 +/- 129, p = 0.07). 57% of the ST group by TEG and 43% of the ST cases by Accumetrics PRU had results > two standard deviations above the expected mean in the control group.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates reduced platelet response to clopidogrel in some patients with DES ST compared to matched controls. The availability of point-of-care assays that can detect these responses raises the possibility of prospectively identifying DES patients at risk of ST and manipulating their subsequent risk.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus